The Fiancée Farce Review | Alexandria Bellefleur | Is It Worth Reading?

This post contains affiliate links, including Amazon and Libro.fm. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Verdict: A warm, high-spice marriage-of-convenience comedy whose leads talk to each other like adults, undercut by farce mechanics six separate reviewers simply cannot believe.

Best for: Readers who want low-angst sapphic comfort with real heat and no miscommunication plot, and who are happy to let a premise be silly if the couple is sound.

Heat level: ★★★★☆ (4/5 — romance.io’s “explicit open door” band, one notch below the top)

Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.8/5 — a 3.95 Goodreads average across 20,831 ratings, with the plot the one thing six reviewers cannot get past)

Tropes: Marriage of convenience, fake relationship, class difference, forced proximity, found family, opposites attract, insta-love, rich heroine, bookseller heroine, dual POV.

The Fiancée Farce is a standalone contemporary lesbian romance published by Avon in April 2023, in which a bookseller’s invented girlfriend turns out to be a real woman — a publishing heiress with a reason of her own to want a wife.

It holds a 3.95 average across 20,831 Goodreads ratings, and the distribution is unusually kind: 41% four stars, 4% two, under 1% one. There is no angry minority here. What there is instead is a very large group of readers who liked the couple and did not believe the plot, and that tension is the whole story of this book’s reception. Both halves of it are worth understanding before you start.

What Is The Fiancée Farce About?

This is marriage of convenience played as screwball — a lie that escalates faster than anyone can manage it, a wealthy family with conditions attached, and two women who keep having to perform a relationship in front of people who would very much like it to fail. The class difference is the load-bearing element: one lead has a bookshop and no safety net, the other has a company and a great deal to lose, and the book is honest about what that asymmetry does to a negotiation.

Tansy arrives having told a small lie for the most ordinary reason imaginable, and finds it made real by someone with far more resources than she has. Gemma arrives with a corporate problem that a marriage solves. The book runs dual POV, and the thing it does best with that structure is refuse the obvious: both women say what they mean, more or less when they mean it, which is why five separate reviewers name the absence of a miscommunication plot as their favourite thing about it.

What Makes This Sapphic Marriage-of-Convenience Romance Work

• Open communication: Five reviewers name it, making it the most consistent praise on the book’s Goodreads page. When something goes wrong, these two discuss it rather than each assuming the worst for eighty pages.
• Chemistry and banter: Seven or more reviewers name the interplay between Tansy and Gemma. Amazon’s own summary leads with banter and snark.
• Real heat: romance.io bands it four of five, “explicit open door” — meaningfully warmer than most of the fake-dating shelf, and StoryGraph readers have logged sexual content 73 times at the graphic tier.
• Teddy: The flamboyant best friend is named as the funniest thing in the book by four or more sources. He is also, precisely, the reason one reader gave up at 36% — a character who does exactly what he is designed to do, to opposite effect.
• It is unmistakably comfort reading: StoryGraph votes lighthearted 83%, funny 71%, with a 2% did-not-finish rate. People finish this book and feel better.

Book Synopsis

Tansy Adams runs a bookshop she inherited and cannot afford to keep, in a life arranged around a stepfamily who have never once made room for her. The fiancée she invents is an act of small self-defence — a way to stop a conversation she has had too many times, told to people she assumes will never check.

Gemma van Dalen has the opposite problem and the opposite resources. She is heir to a publishing empire, she is under conditions she did not set, and she needs a wife rather more urgently than she needs a girlfriend. When she works out that Tansy has already invented her, the arrangement more or less proposes itself.

What follows is the lie widening past the point where either of them can quietly step out of it: a wedding, a shared address, a family that watches closely and wishes them ill, and two women discovering they are considerably better at being married than either expected. The question the book circles is not whether they will fall for each other — it is whether either will risk saying so while the arrangement is still doing its job.

My Review

The best thing about this book is that its two leads are not idiots. That sounds like faint praise and it is not: five separate reviewers name the open communication as the single reason they loved it, in a subgenre where the standard third act is two people who could resolve everything in one conversation and refuse to have it. When something goes wrong between Tansy and Gemma, one of them says so. It changes the entire texture of the reading experience.

The second strength is that Bellefleur can write a scene. Seven or more reviewers name the banter, the heat is genuinely high for the shelf at romance.io’s four of five, and the comic set pieces mostly land. Teddy is the clearest demonstration of the book’s register — four or more sources call him the funniest thing in it, one reader put the book down over him, and both reactions are legitimate responses to the same character.

Where it struggles is plausibility, and this is the dominant complaint rather than a stray objection. Six of the thirty most-popular reviewers say the farce mechanics do not hold — the escalations require people to behave in ways nobody behaves, and once a reader falls out of the premise there is nothing to climb back in on. Six more find the antagonists cartoonish or simply too numerous, which compounds it: a farce needs its obstacles to feel like people. Five name the pacing as rushed or the attraction as insta-love, a reading romance.io itself corroborates by tagging the book insta-love without being asked. Two more say the third act is contrived and leaves subplots dangling. And a smaller group, two to four depending on how you count, found it less steamy than Bellefleur’s other books despite the marketing.

The expectation to reset is what the packaging promises. Avon sells a steamy sapphic rom-com; Publishers Weekly, reviewing the same book, calls it slow-burn; romance.io puts it a notch below its top band; and Amazon’s own shelf placement ranks it #320 in Feel-Good Fiction ahead of #583 in LGBTQ+ Romance. It is warmer than most of the fake-dating shelf and cooler than the word “steamy” implies. There is a second, quieter gap: StoryGraph readers split 54% yes against 30% no on whether the cast is diverse, which is a low figure for a 2023 Big Five title and one no reviewer outside a single Goodreads voice raised.

My honest note: A genuinely likeable romance built on a plot that will not survive close inspection. If you can accept a farce as a farce, the couple is one of the healthiest in contemporary sapphic romance; if implausibility pulls you out of a book, it will pull you out of this one early.

Element	In The Fiancée Farce
Central relationship	Tansy Adams & Gemma van Dalen — a struggling bookseller and the publishing heiress she accidentally invented
Core tropes	Marriage of convenience, fake relationship, class difference, forced proximity, found family, opposites attract
Setting	Contemporary Seattle — an independent bookshop and a family publishing empire
Heat level	4/5 — romance.io’s “explicit open door” band
Series	Standalone, unconnected to the Written in the Stars trilogy — resolves with an HEA
Content notes	Explicit sexual content, sexual harassment, bullying, death of a parent and ongoing grief, emotional abuse and gaslighting by a stepfamily, classism, alcohol

How Spicy Is The Fiancée Farce?

Four out of five. romance.io files it in its “explicit open door” band — one notch below the top of the scale — and StoryGraph’s readers back that up with 73 submissions of sexual content at the graphic tier, the highest single warning on the book. This is the warmest title in this batch by a clear margin, and heat is a genuine part of the draw rather than punctuation.

Two things are worth flagging in advance. The first is that a handful of readers still found it less steamy than they expected — Publishers Weekly itself describes the book as slow-burn, so the explicit material is concentrated rather than constant. The second is sexual harassment, which StoryGraph readers logged 42 times at the graphic tier and 36 at moderate; it is part of the workplace and family material, not the romance. No reviewer reports violence, gore or non-consent between the leads. For a comparable at the same band, Those Who Wait also sits at romance.io’s 4 of 5.

Who Should Read This Book?

You’ll likely love it if: you are tired of miscommunication plots and want two people who actually talk, you read for banter and comic set pieces, you want more heat than the fake-dating shelf usually offers, and you can take a premise on its own terms.

You may want to skip it if: implausibility breaks a book for you, you need antagonists with interior lives rather than obstacles, insta-love in a marriage plot will not convince you, or you want the wealth-and-class material examined rather than used as scenery.

In short: the healthiest couple on the shelf, inside the least believable plot.

What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)

Start with the publisher’s own quote block, because it does not say what it appears to say. Amazon’s editorial reviews carry two starred quotes — one from Booklist, one from Library Journal — and both are for Count Your Lucky Stars, Bellefleur’s earlier novel, not for this book. There is no Library Journal review of The Fiancée Farce and no starred review of it at all. What is genuinely about this book: Publishers Weekly, unstarred, from November 2022, which describes it as slow-burn and notes a profusion of Taylor Swift references; Kirkus, unstarred, from February 2023, closing on a line about opposites attracting as a new twist on an old trope; a Booklist quote sourced only through Amazon; and author blurbs from Sierra Simone, Sarah MacLean and Mazey Eddings. Anyone citing that block secondhand would be crediting this novel with two starred reviews it never received.

The trade-versus-reader gap follows directly. Kirkus and Publishers Weekly both reviewed it positively and neither mentions plausibility once — the single most-repeated reader complaint, raised by six of the thirty most-popular Goodreads reviewers. Neither mentions the diverse-cast split either. The professionals reviewed the prose and the premise; the readers reviewed whether the premise works.

BookTok activity is real but the shape matters: Bellefleur’s own account posted a tropes video and a cover reveal, at least two creator posts carry partner tags and credit an Avon-funded tour, and there is a modest genuine tail beyond that. This is not the pattern where everything traces back to the author — it is the standard Big Five pattern, author account plus paid promotion plus organic remainder. No viral moment surfaced, and TikTok exposes no usable metrics.

Reddit is concentrated rather than broad, and the concentration is informative: 33 Bellefleur threads on r/LesbianBookClub and 25 on r/sapphicbooks, against two incidental hits on r/RomanceBooks. The general romance sub barely discusses her. In the sapphic subs the verdict skews warm — multiple commenters in a 43-comment thread name this as their favourite Bellefleur — but a 106-comment thread on books everyone loves and you could not get into carries three dissenting comments, one at +8 saying they hated the writing and the lead. Notably, in a 302-comment thread on the worst sapphic romance anyone has read, the only Bellefleur title named is Written in the Stars, not this one.

The audiobook is narrated by Lauren Sweet for Avon and HarperAudio, 12 hours 39 minutes, released day-and-date with print. Reaction to the performance is consistently positive — four or more Audible reviewers praise her directly, and Jude in the Stars credits Sweet’s performance with carrying the book, singling out her British-accented Teddy. There is one recurring complaint and it is specific rather than general: three independent sources name mispronounced French, and Jude in the Stars explicitly assigns that to the author and publisher rather than the narrator.

Prefer audio? Listen to The Fiancée Farce on Libro.fm — the audiobook shop that supports independent bookstores.

Why readers love it (according to the discourse): open communication first, named by five reviewers and the most consistent praise on the page. Then chemistry and banter at seven or more. Then the Taylor Swift references, named approvingly by five — the same feature two others list as a complaint. Then Teddy, then the low-angst comfort. The minority position worth flagging is that several readers rate this above the Written in the Stars trilogy; Bookreporter’s pull-quote calls it the best of the bunch so far, and the top comment in one r/LesbianBookClub thread agrees.

What readers argue about and complain about: Plausibility, above everything. Six reviewers say the farce does not hold up, and the mechanism is that the escalations need people to act against their own obvious interests. Second, and equally weighted: the antagonists, with six reviewers calling them cartoonish or too numerous, which matters more in a farce than it would elsewhere. Third: five say insta-love or a rushed pace, and romance.io’s own tag set agrees. Fourth: two to four found it less steamy than expected, and Publishers Weekly’s slow-burn framing suggests they were not wrong. Fifth: two say the third act is contrived and drops subplots — one reviewer moved from five stars to one over the ending alone. Teddy is the genuine split: the funniest thing in the book for four or more readers, and the stated reason another put it down at 36%.

The standalone question worth asking first: This is a standalone with no connection to the Written in the Stars trilogy, confirmed three ways, and nothing in this sweep reports a cliffhanger or an unresolved couple — the ending complaint is about contrivance and dangling subplots, not a failed HEA. Where to go next is the more useful question, and the answer is contested: Count Your Lucky Stars is the book whose starred reviews keep getting misattributed to this one, and Written in the Stars is her best-known — and also the only Bellefleur title named in Reddit’s worst-of thread.

Frequently Asked Questions

How spicy is The Fiancée Farce?

A 4/5. romance.io bands it “explicit open door,” one notch below the top, and sexual content is the most-submitted content warning on StoryGraph at 73 graphic submissions. It is warmer than most of the fake-dating shelf.

Do I need to read Written in the Stars first?

No. The Fiancée Farce is a standalone with no connection to that trilogy — confirmed by Goodreads, romance.io and the author’s own site. There is no sequel and no reading order.

Did The Fiancée Farce get starred trade reviews?

No. Publishers Weekly and Kirkus both reviewed it without a star. The two starred quotes on Amazon’s listing — from Booklist and Library Journal — are for Count Your Lucky Stars, and no Library Journal review of this book exists.

Is there a miscommunication plot?

No, and that is the book’s most-praised quality. Five separate reviewers name the open communication between Tansy and Gemma as the reason they loved it.

Is the audiobook worth it?

Yes, with one caveat. Lauren Sweet narrates the 12 hour 39 minute Avon edition and listeners consistently praise the performance, particularly Teddy. Three independent sources flag mispronounced French, which reviewers attribute to the publisher rather than the narrator.

If You Loved The Fiancée Farce, Read These Next

Three with a specific point of contact. Count Your Lucky Stars is the Bellefleur that actually earned the starred reviews this book gets credited with, at a similar warmth. D’Vaughn and Kris Plan a Wedding runs the fake-marriage premise with the family pressure treated as the real obstacle rather than as farce. And Delilah Green Doesn’t Care gives you the same warmth and heat with antagonists who behave like people. More in contemporary lesbian romance and across all our book reviews.

The Bottom Line

The Fiancée Farce wants to be a screwball marriage-of-convenience comedy with real heat and no manufactured misunderstandings, and on two of those three counts it delivers completely. The communication between the leads is the healthiest on the contemporary sapphic shelf, the banter lands, and the spice is a genuine four of five. Against that: a plot six reviewers cannot believe, antagonists six more call cartoonish, and a third act that leaves threads hanging. It is worth it if you can take a farce on its own terms — and not if implausibility is what ends a book for you. Check The Fiancée Farce on Amazon →

The Eikna Overall Ranking

On the Eikna scale, The Fiancée Farce ranks as a high-comfort sapphic marriage-of-convenience comedy — warm, funny and unusually well communicated, weakened by a premise that will not bear weight, and best approached for the couple rather than the plot.

The Evidence Scorecard

Overall ★★★★☆ 3.8/5

• ✓ 3.95 average across 20,831 Goodreads ratings
• ✓ 2% did-not-finish rate on StoryGraph
• ✓ Under 1% of ratings are one star
• ✓ No starred trade review, despite the listing

Romance ★★★★☆ 4/5

• ✓ Open communication named by five reviewers
• ✓ Chemistry and banter named by seven or more
• ✓ No miscommunication plot anywhere
• ✓ Five reviewers call the attraction rushed

Characters ★★★★☆ 3.5/5

• ✓ 88% call the characters loveable
• ✓ Teddy is the funniest thing in the book
• ✓ 62% say character flaws are a focus
• ✓ Six reviewers call the antagonists cartoonish

Writing ★★★★☆ 3.9/5

• ✓ Comic set pieces mostly land
• ✓ Amazon readers cite writing style 14 times
• ✓ Taylor Swift references praised by five
• ✓ Publishers Weekly notes a profusion of them

Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 3.7/5

• ✓ Grief and a dead parent carry real weight
• ✓ Stepfamily gaslighting is genuinely unpleasant
• ✓ Lighthearted tops the moods at 83%
• ✓ Low stakes by design, and it shows

Heat Level ★★★★☆ 4/5

• ✓ romance.io bands it “explicit open door,” 4 of 5
• ✓ Sexual content logged 73 times as graphic
• ✓ Warmest title on the fake-dating shelf here
• ✓ Publishers Weekly still calls it slow-burn

Ending ★★★★☆ 3.6/5

• ✓ Clean HEA, no cliffhanger, no sequel
• ✓ Family plot resolves rather than lingering
• ✓ Standalone confirmed three ways
• ✓ Two reviewers say subplots are left dangling

Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.8/5

• ✓ Named a favourite Bellefleur in sapphic subs
• ✓ Low-angst comfort reading by design
• ✓ Sweet’s narration rewards a second pass
• ✓ The farce loses more on a re-read, not less

Affiliate disclosure: Lesbian Romance Reads participates in the Amazon Associates Program and the Libro.fm affiliate program. If you buy through a link on this page we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you.