Lady Venom Takes a Mistress Review — Is It Worth Reading?

Verdict: A gothic sapphic monster romance with a genuinely great premise, a magnetic serpent-queen love interest and 5/5 heat, undercut by a 124-page length that leaves most of its plot as an outline.

Best for: Readers who want a femme-dom monster, explicit spice and a man-killing revenge fantasy in one sitting, and who can forgive a romance that goes from captivity to devotion in about a day.

Heat level: ★★★★★ (5/5 — explicit and plentiful)

Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.5/5 — a 3.73 Goodreads average and a 3.59 on StoryGraph, held down by the length almost every reviewer wanted doubled)

Tropes: Captive romance, femme dom, monster romance, gothic haunted manor, Beauty and the Beast retelling, Medusa retelling, age gap, virgin heroine, praise kink, forced proximity.

Lady Venom Takes A Mistress by Kat Blackthorne is a standalone 124-page novella — self-published through the author’s own Dark Hearts Press imprint in September 2023, set in the same universe as her Halloween Boys series but requiring none of it — that runs as a paranormal sapphic romance in a loosely historical setting, where Poesy Laroche escapes a marriage auction into the woods and is claimed as a mistress by the snake-attended monster the villagers call Lady Venom.

It has a 3.73 average across 2,821 Goodreads ratings, a 3.59 across 745 on StoryGraph, and a 4.2 across 1,093 on Amazon — where the book is filed not under Romance but under Erotica. The reviews split harder than 3.73 suggests: 60% of Goodreads ratings sit at four or five stars, and 37% sit at three or below. Both halves of that split are worth understanding before you start.

What Is Lady Venom Takes a Mistress About?

Lady Venom Takes A Mistress is a gothic monster romance and a captive romance, and the two labels carry most of the book’s DNA. Gothic means the haunted estate, the watching flowers, the whispering ghosts and the maze — the manor is a character, and readers say so constantly. Captive means the central power imbalance is the point rather than an obstacle: Lady Venom takes Poesy, tells her there is no escape, and the erotic charge runs through that arrangement rather than around it. romance.io’s users tag the book fem-dom, non-human heroine, abduction and age gap, which is an accurate map of what is actually on the page.

Poesy is introduced through what she has been denied. She is property at auction, promised to a man who has told her plainly he intends to break her, and her only act of authorship is to run somewhere worse. Lady Venom is introduced through what the world assumes about her — a legend, a scream in the trees, a thing to be feared — and the book’s real business is dismantling that assumption from the inside. It is told in first person, which keeps you sealed inside Poesy’s disorientation and means Lady Venom stays unreadable for exactly as long as the plot needs her to.

What Makes This Gothic Sapphic Monster Romance Work

  • The premise: A sapphic Medusa crossed with Beauty and the Beast is the element readers name first and most consistently, and even the harshest reviews concede the idea is excellent before dismantling the execution.
  • Lady Venom herself: The serpent-attended monster is the reason this book has 2,821 ratings. Readers describe her as mysterious, reserved, witty and genuinely frightening, and she carries scenes the plot does not.
  • The revenge fantasy: Every man in the book is a monster and most of them die badly. This lands as catharsis rather than cheap shock, and it is the single most repeated pleasure in the reviews.
  • The heat: Rated 5/5 “explicit and plentiful” by romance.io — its top band — and readers treat the spice as the headline rather than the seasoning.
  • It commits to the gothic: Snakes, ghosts, poisonous gardens, a cursed estate. The atmosphere is doing real work, and the paranormal furniture is not decorative.

Book Synopsis

Poesy Laroche has spent years sabotaging her own prospects, and it has finally stopped working. The auction is a formality dressed as a ceremony: women are bid on, sold, and delivered to husbands who have already explained what will happen to them. Poesy’s winning bidder has been explicit about his intentions. Her mother is satisfied. There is no version of the day that ends with Poesy free, so she does the only thing left and runs into the forest everyone in the village has spent her whole life warning her about.

The woods belong to a story rather than a person. Screams at night, a manor nobody returns from, a lady made of snakes. Poesy would rather be killed by something beautiful than kept by something ordinary, and she walks in with that calculation intact. What she finds is a maze she cannot leave, an estate where the flowers pay attention and the dead have opinions, and a mistress of the house who looks at her and decides she is keeping her.

Lady Venom is not the legend. She is colder and stranger and considerably funnier than the stories allow, and she is bound to the estate by something Poesy is not told about. The bargain between them is one-sided by design — Poesy has no route out, and no particular wish to find one — and the danger in the manor is not the danger the village imagined. There are ghosts here who died for a reason. There is a curse with an author. And the question underneath the whole arrangement is whether the thing keeping Lady Venom in this house is the same thing that will eventually take Poesy out of it.

My Review

The concept is the best thing here and I want to be clear about how good it is, because everything after this is a qualification. A sapphic Medusa who is also the Beast, running a haunted estate staffed by ghosts and snakes, who takes a woman fleeing a marriage auction and finds she has taken something that bites back — that is a premise worth a full novel, and Blackthorne writes the top layer of it with real flair. Lady Venom is genuinely magnetic. She has the best lines, the best entrances, and a menace the book never softens for the sake of the romance.

Lady Venom Takes a Mistress by Kat Blackthorne book cover

The gothic texture is the other real pleasure. The manor, the maze, the watching garden, the ghosts who turn protective when the house is threatened — readers single these out repeatedly, and one Goodreads reviewer calls the writing lyrically beautiful in exactly the passages where the setting is doing the work. The other consistent draw is blunter: every man in this book is vile and most of them are killed, usually by the two women together, and the reviews are full of people who found that specifically restorative. As one Goodreads reviewer put it, her favourite genre might be “lesbians falling in love then killing men together.” That is not a joke about the book — it is an accurate description of what it delivers and why people love it.

Where it struggles is length, and this is not my preference against the crowd’s — it is the single most repeated criticism in the reviews, and it comes from the five-star reviewers as often as the one-star ones. The book is 124 pages, and reader after reader says the same thing in different words: this needed to be a novel. One Amazon reviewer puts the shortfall at another 150 to 200 pages. The consequences stack. The romance is instalove by structure rather than by choice — several readers note the leads are in bed inside about a day, and one describes Poesy’s feelings flip-flopping paragraph to paragraph for the whole book. The lore is sketched and then asserted: how Lady Venom became what she is, why the original bargain protected the ghosts, why a vampire from another of the author’s books is here at all. A one-star reviewer’s verdict is harsh and not entirely wrong — the smut is written and the plot is outlined. Line-level craft draws its own cluster of complaints, with multiple readers calling the prose poorly edited, and a specific recurring flag on the dialogue: a StoryGraph reader and two Amazon reviewers independently note the characters switch between period register and thoroughly modern speech, which pulls the historical setting apart. There is a real minority who love the prose and quote it at length, so this one is taste-dependent — but the register problem is named too often to be dismissed.

One expectation to reset, and it is ours as much as anyone’s, since this book sits at number ten in our own spicy sapphic romantasy guide. Amazon does not shelve it as romance. It sits under Erotica, and its category ranks are in LGBTQ+ Horror and Fantasy Erotica. That is the more honest label. This is a 124-page erotica novella with a gothic fantasy setting, not a romantasy in the sense that a reader coming from a 500-page magic-system book means it. If you want worldbuilding with rules and a slow burn, calibrate hard. If what you want is a monster, a manor and an extremely explicit weekend, this is exactly the right size.

My honest note: A novel’s worth of ideas compressed into a novella’s worth of pages, and you can feel the missing 200. If you read for plot and earned romance, the gaps will be all you see. If you read for atmosphere, a great villainess and heat, it delivers everything it actually promises.

Element In Lady Venom Takes a Mistress
Central relationship Poesy Laroche & Lady Venom (Alabaster Baudelaire) — runaway bride and serpent-queen monster, captive romance
Core tropes Captive romance, femme dom, monster romance, gothic haunted manor, age gap, praise kink, virgin heroine
Setting A cursed manor and maze in the woods beyond a village that auctions its women — period unspecified and inconsistently drawn
Heat level 5/5 — explicit and plentiful
Series Standalone novella set in The Halloween Boys universe; no prior reading needed, no sequel announced
Content notes Dubious consent, abuse and rape flagged by romance.io users; attempted rape and sexual harassment flagged by a Goodreads reviewer; graphic on-page killings, captivity, snakes throughout

How Dark and Spicy Is Lady Venom Takes a Mistress?

A full 5/5. romance.io rates the steam level “explicit and plentiful,” its top band — the same rating it gives the most explicit titles in the genre — and reader consensus backs it without qualification. Individual reviewers put the spice at 4/5 and 5/5 in their own breakdowns, and the recurring note is that the sex is the most fully realised writing in the book. It arrives early, it recurs, and it is inventively supernatural about what a serpent-monster can do.

The darkness needs naming separately, because it is real and it is front-loaded. romance.io’s users flag dubious consent, abuse and rape on this title, and a Goodreads reviewer warns specifically for attempted rape and sexual harassment. The premise is captivity, the power imbalance is not resolved before the sex begins, and the violence against the male characters is graphic — at least one reviewer who otherwise loved the book describes a particular scene as genuinely difficult to shake off. That said, the tone is revenge fantasy rather than grimdark, and no reviewer I found reports the cruelty being directed at the leads. For more in this register, browse the paranormal and fantasy reviews.

Who Should Read This Book?

You’ll likely love it if: you want a monster love interest who stays monstrous, you read for atmosphere over plot mechanics, you want explicit heat from the first act, and a book you can finish in one evening is a feature rather than a compromise.

You may want to skip it if: instalove ruins a romance for you, you need worldbuilding that explains itself, unpolished prose and modern dialogue in a historical setting pull you out, or you were promised romantasy and will feel short-changed by a 124-page erotica novella.

In short: a superb premise and a genuinely great villainess, delivered at a third of the length the story needed.

What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)

There is no viral moment here and no professional coverage of any kind. I found no Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Library Journal or Booklist review, and none of the sapphic review blogs — The Lesbrary, LezReviewBooks, Bookish Sapphic, Jude in the Stars, I Heart SapphFic — appear to have covered it. Amazon’s “Editorial Reviews” block looks like trade coverage at a glance but is not: all three pull-quotes are from named Goodreads reviewers rather than outlets. What the book does have is genuine, modest, organic BookTok activity from ordinary reader accounts alongside the author’s own, and one Goodreads reviewer blames BookTok outright for the recommendation. Discovery is otherwise doing the quiet indie thing: a low Kindle price, Kindle Unlimited availability, a bestseller-rank foothold in LGBTQ+ Horror and Fantasy Erotica, and an author-produced audiobook narrated by Calamity Jane Lane, self-released in 2023 with sound design that listeners describe as immersive — the runtime is not published on any retail listing I could reach, and there is no Libro.fm edition. Nearly three years on, it is still accumulating ratings: 172 people were reading it and 4,865 had it shelved as want-to-read on the day I checked.

Why readers love it (according to the discourse): The man-killing, first and loudest — “female rage,” “women’s rights and wrongs” and variations on I like that the men die recur across Goodreads, StoryGraph and Amazon from readers who otherwise disagree about everything. Then Lady Venom as a character, who is admired even in two-star reviews. Then the gothic atmosphere: the ghosts, the snakes, the garden, the manor. The spice is named as a headline feature by almost everyone, including readers who disliked the book. And a real minority praises the prose specifically — quoting lines, calling the imagery lyrical — which is notable, because unpolished writing is one of the loudest complaints. Audio listeners are warm about it too, with one crediting the narrator’s “smooth, husky voice” for the atmosphere.

What readers argue about and complain about: Length, above everything, and unusually it is the same complaint from lovers and detractors. Reviewers at every star level say the book should have been a novel; the phrasing “I wish this had more plot development” turns up in five-star reviews. Second, and downstream of the first: the romance is instalove. Readers note the leads sleep together inside roughly a day, and one describes the emotional arc oscillating paragraph to paragraph rather than building. Third, the lore is asserted rather than explained — how Lady Venom became what she is, why the curse protects the ghosts, why a vampire from another of the author’s books appears at all. Fourth, editing and register: a StoryGraph reviewer calls it “As poorly edited as it is written,” and an Amazon reviewer names the specific mechanism, describing dialogue that switches between Victorian-era and modern English. Fifth, the ending is abrupt; several readers wanted the aftermath the book skips, and the epilogue’s transformation reads to some as a shortcut to the happy ending. The genuine split is on the prose: a substantial minority find it quotable and atmospheric where the majority find it rushed, and one five-star reviewer cheerfully calls the writing atrocious while giving it full marks anyway. Worth noting against all of this: StoryGraph’s did-not-finish rate is only 2%, well under the rates I have been seeing on longer titles this month. People are not bouncing off this book. They finish it, and then they wish there had been more of it.

The standalone question worth asking first: it resolves completely. Poesy and Lady Venom get a happily-ever-after, there is an epilogue, and nothing is required before or after it — the Halloween Boys crossover is flavour, not homework. No sequel has been announced as of August 2026, despite a steady stream of reviews asking for one. If you want more of this author, the honest picture is that this is her lowest-rated widely-read title: Lady Venom sits at 3.73 across 2,821 Goodreads ratings, while her most-read book, Ghost, holds 4.04 across more than 11,000. Among her other sapphic titles, Selah Gothic rates 3.94 across roughly 1,600 ratings and sWitch sits level with this one at 3.73. Go to Ghost for the strongest reception and to Selah Gothic for the nearest sapphic gothic neighbour.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Lady Venom Takes a Mistress end on a cliffhanger?

No. It is a complete standalone with a happily-ever-after and an epilogue. Some readers find the final chapters abrupt and wish for more aftermath, but you are not left hanging and no sequel is required.

How spicy is Lady Venom Takes a Mistress?

A 5/5. romance.io rates it “explicit and plentiful,” its top band. The scenes are graphic, supernaturally inventive and arrive early, and readers across every rating level name the spice as the book’s strongest element.

Do I need to read The Halloween Boys first?

No. It shares a universe and some crossover lore, and one side character comes from those books, but the publisher’s own description confirms no prior reading is needed. Several readers found that crossover character confusing precisely because they had not read the series.

Is it actually romantasy?

Not in the way most readers mean. Amazon files it under Erotica, with category ranks in LGBTQ+ Horror and Fantasy Erotica, and it runs 124 pages. It is a gothic monster erotica novella with fantasy furniture rather than a plotted fantasy romance.

Is there an audiobook?

Yes — narrated by Calamity Jane Lane and self-released by the author in 2023, with sound design that listeners repeatedly describe as immersive. No runtime is published on the retail listings, and there is no Libro.fm edition.

What are the content warnings?

romance.io’s users flag dubious consent, abuse and rape; a Goodreads reviewer adds attempted rape and sexual harassment. Expect captivity, a power imbalance treated as erotic, graphic on-page killings of male characters, and snakes throughout.

If You Loved Lady Venom Takes a Mistress, Read These Next

Readers who want the captive dynamic taken seriously at full length land most often on Captive in the Underworld by Lianyu Tan, which runs the same power imbalance far darker and with none of the softening. If the fairy-tale bones are the draw, Bitterthorn by Kat Dunn is the sapphic Beauty and the Beast with room to actually build the isolation. And for the same 5/5 heat band inside a plotted fantasy novel, Her Spell That Binds Me gives you the explicit sapphic romantasy this book is shelved beside but does not quite belong to. Browse the paranormal and fantasy lesbian romance collection or the full Book Reviews archive for more.

The Bottom Line

Lady Venom Takes A Mistress is a book with a novel’s ambition and a novella’s page count. The premise is excellent, Lady Venom is a genuinely great monster, and the heat delivers exactly the 5/5 it is rated. It is also structurally rushed, built on lore it never explains, and carrying a romance that resolves before it has earned anything. Whether that trade works depends entirely on what you came for — but at 124 pages the cost of finding out is low, and StoryGraph’s 2% did-not-finish rate says almost nobody regrets starting. Check Lady Venom Takes a Mistress on Amazon →

The Eikna Overall Ranking

On the Eikna scale, Lady Venom Takes a Mistress ranks as a high-concept indie gothic erotica novella — atmospheric and genuinely cathartic, hollowed out by its own brevity, and best approached for the monster and the heat rather than the plot.

The Evidence Scorecard

Overall ★★★★☆ 3.5/5

  • ✓ 3.73 average across 2,821 Goodreads ratings
  • ✓ 3.59 on StoryGraph, 4.2 on Amazon
  • ✓ Only 2% did-not-finish on StoryGraph
  • ✓ 37% of Goodreads ratings are three or below

Romance ★★★☆☆ 3.4/5

  • ✓ Femme-dom dynamic genuinely charged
  • ✓ Banter between the leads widely praised
  • ✓ Devotion arc lands for most readers
  • ✓ Instalove named across every rating level

Characters ★★★★☆ 3.5/5

  • ✓ Lady Venom admired even in negative reviews
  • ✓ 75% call the characters loveable on StoryGraph
  • ✓ Poesy keeps a spine under captivity
  • ✓ 30% say character development is weak

Writing ★★★☆☆ 3/5

  • ✓ Gothic imagery is the strongest craft element
  • ✓ A real minority quote the prose admiringly
  • ✓ Sex scenes are the most fully written passages
  • ✓ Editing and period-versus-modern dialogue flagged repeatedly

Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 3.6/5

  • ✓ Revenge catharsis is the most-named pleasure
  • ✓ The auction opening genuinely stings
  • ✓ 85% of StoryGraph readers mark it dark
  • ✓ Stakes undercut by unexplained lore

Heat Level ★★★★★ 5/5

  • ✓ romance.io top band, explicit and plentiful
  • ✓ Explicit from the first act onward
  • ✓ Inventively supernatural rather than generic
  • ✓ Dubious consent and abuse flagged by users

Ending ★★★☆☆ 3.3/5

  • ✓ Complete standalone, no cliffhanger
  • ✓ HEA delivered with an epilogue
  • ✓ Epilogue twist praised by some readers
  • ✓ Repeatedly described as abrupt and rushed

Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.6/5

  • ✓ 124 pages makes a revisit cheap
  • ✓ Immersive audiobook is a strong second pass
  • ✓ Quotable lines readers return to
  • ✓ Thin plot leaves little to rediscover

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Feast While You Can Review — Is It Worth Reading?

Verdict: The most convincing butch/femme yearning I’ve read in a trade-published horror novel, undercut by a first half that takes too long to bite and an ending readers repeatedly say loses its nerve.

Best for: Readers who want literary queer horror first and romance second, who left Our Wives Under the Sea wanting something filthier, and who won’t be stopped by graphic animal death.

Heat level: ★★★★☆ (4/5 — explicit open door)

Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.7/5 — a 3.89 Goodreads average across 3,975 ratings, marked down for a slow first half and a divisive ending)

Tropes: Forbidden romance, brother’s ex, butch/femme, small-town claustrophobia, possession horror, touch as the only cure, secret relationship, slow-burn yearning, coming home, nontraditional HEA.

Feast While You Can by Mikaella Clements and Onjuli Datta is a standalone queer possession-horror novel, 304 pages, published by Grand Central in the US on 29 October 2024 and Simon & Schuster in the UK five days earlier, written by a married Berlin-based duo, and built on a mechanism doing double duty as plot and metaphor — an ancient thing in the caves above the mountain town of Cadenze latches onto Angelina Sicco, and the only force repelling it is the touch of Jagvi, her brother’s ex, which turns a relationship they have every reason to hide into the thing keeping Angelina alive.

The numbers show a well-liked book with a real split underneath. Goodreads has it at 3.89 across 3,975 ratings — 29% five stars, 39% four, only 7% at two or one. StoryGraph runs warmer at 4.04 from 2,719 reviews, 90% choosing “dark” as a mood. romance.io scores it 4.16 and sets the heat at 4/5, “Explicit open door.” It was shortlisted for the 2025 British Fantasy Award for Best Horror Novel, losing to Johanna van Veen’s My Darling Dreadful Thing. The split is not about quality. It’s about which genre you thought you were buying — readers who came for horror mostly got it, and readers who came for romance found the romance is the horror.

What Is Feast While You Can About?

This is folk horror with a romance engine bolted into its centre, and the join is the interesting part. Cadenze is a dead-end valley town between three mountains, tourist-fed in summer and comatose the rest of the year, with Roman ruins, a recent war in its memory, and family lore about the caves. The authors never name the country — Italian names, a nonna, wartime scars, enough that Publishers Weekly called it Italian outright. Most readers take the vagueness as intentional: this is any town that tolerates a lesbian as long as she stays quiet.

The romance is not decorative and not a subplot. Angelina and Jagvi’s relationship is the anti-possession mechanism, so every scene of desire is also a scene of survival, and every reason they have to stay apart — Patrick, the family, the town, a decade of resentment — is a reason for Angelina to be eaten. That is why the sex carries weight that sex in horror novels usually doesn’t.

What Makes This Sapphic Folk Horror Work

  • The mechanism: Touch as the only cure turns desire into life support, and 22 of 450 Goodreads reviews single out the resulting tension.
  • The butch/femme writing: 21 reviewers praise the dynamic by name and “butch” appears in 52 of 450 — central texture, not incidental representation.
  • The body horror: StoryGraph readers flagged gore graphic 34 times, body horror 26, cannibalism 14.
  • The town: Kirkus calls it “a fresh, queer spin on possession horror”; 88 of 450 reviews name the Siccos, the real antagonist.
  • The prose: Two authors, one voice — two reviewers in 270 noticed the co-writing, and Muir, Armfield and van der Wouden all blurbed it.

Book Synopsis

Angelina Sicco has never left Cadenze and does not particularly want to. She lives with her friend Gemma and her brother Patrick in a town that knows she is a lesbian and files it under things it does not discuss, taking what she can get from the summer tourists. Her place inside the Sicco clan cost her freedom.

Then Jagvi comes back. She dated Patrick, broke it off, came out, and left, and every return since has been the chaos variable in Angelina’s life. This time the caves stir with her, and something old follows Angelina home, gets inside her, and eats through her memories.

Angelina finds the one thing that holds it off: Jagvi’s hands on her skin. What starts as emergency treatment becomes a secret they keep from Patrick, from the Siccos, and from a town that would not survive knowing. The creature feeds on passion and heartbreak, so the more they want each other, the stronger it grows.

My Review

The mechanism is the best idea here and it holds all the way through. Making a woman’s touch the only barrier between another woman and a thing that wants to wear her body could have been cheap, and instead does real work — every time Angelina reaches for Jagvi she admits what she spent a decade refusing, and the town’s homophobia gains teeth, because hiding is now physically dangerous. The New York Times Book Review called it “queer desire as the cure, not the curse.”

Feast While You Can by Mikaella Clements and Onjuli Datta book cover

The writing is genuinely good, worth saying plainly because it is not the norm in this corner of the shelf. Clements and Datta build a suffocating small town with real specificity — the Sicco house, the summer crowds, the caves, the way a place can love you and diminish you at once. The co-authorship is invisible: in 270 reviews, two readers noticed there were two writers. The Lesbrary’s Rachel Friars called it “sharp, clever, and well-written.”

Pacing is the problem, and the single most repeated criticism in the reviews. Eighteen reviewers in my 450-review sample name a slow start, a dragging middle or a slog; ten more call it repetitive. That puts readers in direct conflict with the trade press, the most interesting thing in the evidence file: Publishers Weekly says the story “moves at a breakneck clip,” Kirkus says it runs at a rapid pace, and only BookPage noticed that “the extended family drama is a distraction from the forward momentum.” That drama is also the book’s richest material, so it’s a trade-off, not a fixable flaw — but if you need a horror novel scaring you before page 100, it will test you.

The genre gap is real and readers feel it. Seven say outright that it isn’t scary enough or isn’t really horror, and the blog Just Read It Already landed on 3.5/5 with the note that “it felt more like a romance to me.” Meanwhile every piece of institutional recognition sits on the horror side — a British Fantasy Award shortlist, a Library Journal horror review, a Kirkus review filed under literary fiction. Nobody calls this a romance except the romance databases. If you found it in a sapphic romance guide, including this one, adjust.

Then the content warnings, which are not decoration. StoryGraph’s users put animal death at the top with 87 graphic flags — more than double gore and double sexual content — with animal cruelty at 39 behind it. Seventeen reviews raise it unprompted, several from five-star readers who docked half a star.

My honest note: This is a four-star horror novel and a three-star romance, and which one you’re holding depends on what you came for. If the pitch that hooked you was lesbians repelling a demon by sleeping together, the book takes it seriously and owes you no wedding.

Element In Feast While You Can
Central relationship Angelina Sicco & Jagvi — small-town femme and her brother’s butch ex
Core tropes Forbidden romance, brother’s ex, butch/femme, secret relationship, possession, touch as cure
Setting Cadenze — an unnamed European mountain town with Roman ruins and something in the caves
Heat level 4/5 — explicit open door (romance.io)
Series Standalone; no sequel announced as of August 2026
Content notes Graphic animal death and cruelty, gore, body horror, cannibalism, explicit sex, racism, homophobia, lesbophobia, outing

How Dark and Spicy Is Feast While You Can?

Dark, and darker than the romance framing suggests. Ninety percent of StoryGraph readers chose “dark” as a mood and 68% “tense,” and the graphic content-warning list runs animal death, cruelty, gore, blood, body horror, violence and cannibalism before it reaches the sex. The possession scenes are physical and unpleasant in a way that earns the horror label. Racism, homophobia and lesbophobia were flagged graphic by 22, 18 and 15 readers.

On heat, romance.io puts it at 4/5, “Explicit open door,” and that is accurate. The sex is on the page, explicit, and load-bearing rather than ornamental — 60 of the 450 reviews I read mention it, and 32 StoryGraph readers flagged sexual content as graphic. What it isn’t is frequent the way a contemporary romance is. This is a horror novel that stops for sex when the plot needs the two women touching.

Who Should Read This Book?

You’ll likely love it if: you read horror first and romance second; you want butch/femme writing that treats the dynamic as a personality rather than a label; you like a small town as antagonist; and you don’t need the supernatural rules explained.

You may want to skip it if: graphic animal death is a hard line — it is the most-flagged warning by a wide margin; you need a horror novel moving by page 50; you want a guaranteed romance-genre HEA; or you want your setting anchored to a named place.

In short: exceptional queer horror with a romance at its structural centre, shelved in the wrong genre.

What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)

The discourse here is trade-shaped, not community-shaped, and the absences say as much as the coverage. The book has Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Library Journal, BookPage, People and the New York Times Book Review, plus a British Fantasy Award shortlist — none of it starred. What it lacks is a sapphic-blog footprint: nothing at I Heart SapphFic, Jude in the Stars, LezReviewBooks or Bookish Sapphic, and no BookTok moment. The Lesbrary is the exception, covering it in November 2024 and again in April 2026. This book travelled the literary-horror pipeline and reached sapphic readers second.

Why readers love it (according to the discourse): Atmosphere, loudest — 54 of the 450 reviews I read reach for creepy, eerie, unsettling or dread. Then the butch/femme dynamic, praised by name in 21. The yearning gets credit from 22 reviewers, body horror from 24, the Siccos from 88. StoryGraph backs it: 70% call the characters loveable, 94% call the cast diverse, 70% say character flaws are a main focus.

What readers argue about and complain about: Pace, above everything — 18 reviewers name a slow start or dragging middle, and the mechanism is structural, since the family scenes that give the book its richness are the same ones stalling the horror. Second, the genre gap: seven say it isn’t scary enough, because the entity spends most of the novel as a metaphor for suppressed desire rather than a threat with an agenda. Third, the ending — six call it rushed, the last act resolving the possession faster than the buildup deserved. Fourth, the unnamed country, which a handful find evasive.

The standalone question worth asking first: it is a true standalone. Possession and relationship both resolve, there’s an epilogue, no sequel is announced as of August 2026, and nothing requires further reading. On the ending, spoiler-free: romance.io tags it “Nontraditional HEA,” and having read the reviews closely, Angelina and Jagvi end the book together, with multiple readers using “happily ever after” without irony and not one describing a tragedy. What makes it nontraditional is the price — the resolution permanently changes what Angelina is, and the couple stays bound to Cadenze rather than freed from it. One three-star reviewer said the ending “loses its teeth”; another objected to being sold “a nightmare for a happy ending.” Yes, they get each other. No, it is not the ending a romance reader is trained to expect. The authors’ catalogue offers one other option, The View Was Exhausting (Grand Central, 2021), at 3.63 across 8,682 Goodreads ratings — a fake-dating novel with a mixed-gender pairing, so a curiosity rather than a follow-up. In audio, Feast While You Can is narrated by Jaclyn Kelso.

Prefer audio? Listen to Feast While You Can on Libro.fm — the audiobook shop that supports independent bookstores.

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Feast While You Can have a happy ending?

Yes, with an asterisk. Angelina and Jagvi end the novel together, there is an epilogue, and no reviewer in my sample called the ending tragic — but romance.io tags it a “nontraditional HEA” because the resolution costs Angelina something permanent and binds the couple to Cadenze. Six reviewers found it rushed.

Is Feast While You Can a romance or a horror novel?

Horror, structurally, with the romance as its mechanism. It was shortlisted for the 2025 British Fantasy Award for Best Horror Novel and reviewed as horror by Kirkus and Library Journal, and seven reviewers complained it was not scary enough.

How explicit is Feast While You Can?

A 4/5 on romance.io’s scale, labelled “Explicit open door.” The sex is fully on the page and structurally necessary, since Jagvi’s touch repels the entity, but it recurs less often than in a contemporary romance at the same band.

Is Feast While You Can part of a series?

No, it’s a standalone. Possession plot and relationship both resolve inside 304 pages, there’s an epilogue, and no sequel is announced as of August 2026. The authors’ only other novel is unrelated.

Is there an audiobook, and is it on Kindle Unlimited?

Yes — narrated by Jaclyn Kelso, 10 hours 14 minutes, released by Grand Central on 29 October 2024. Library Journal praised narration that “skillfully evokes the story’s gothic atmosphere.” It is not in Kindle Unlimited; this is a trade-published title.

If You Loved Feast While You Can, Read These Next

Three readers in my sample reached for Julia Armfield’s Our Wives Under the Sea, and Armfield blurbed this book, so start there if what held you was queer body horror as relationship metaphor. If it was the literary register and the sapphic hunger, Kat Dunn’s Hungerstone sits closest on romance.io’s similar-titles list at 3.98, running the same trick with a vampire instead of a cave. And Chuck Tingle’s Bury Your Gays made the same 2025 British Fantasy Award ballot with a far more genre-savvy take on queer monsters. Closest on this site is Providence Girls, which works the same literary-horror register — a monster girlfriend, body horror as intimacy, and a slow burn that earns its ending. For heat-forward books nearby, browse our spicy sapphic romantasy guide or the full run of book reviews.

The Bottom Line

Feast While You Can is a better novel than its Goodreads average suggests and a worse fit for a romance shelf than its tags suggest. The conceit is elegant, the butch/femme writing is the best I’ve read in a trade-published horror title, and the prose earned blurbs from Tamsyn Muir and Julia Armfield without straining. It is also slow for its first third, thinner on scares than its horror shortlist implies, and capped by an ending six reviewers found rushed. Come for the horror and treat the romance as the load-bearing wall it is, and this is a four-star book; come for a sapphic romance with a spooky coat of paint and you’ll spend 150 pages waiting. Check Feast While You Can on Amazon →

The Eikna Overall Ranking

On the Eikna scale, Feast While You Can ranks as a literary sapphic possession horror with a romance engine — elegantly constructed and genuinely charged, held back by a slow first half and an ending that flinches, and best approached for the yearning and the suffocating town rather than for a romance-genre payoff.

The Evidence Scorecard

Overall ★★★★☆ 3.7/5

  • ✓ 3.89 Goodreads average across 3,975 ratings
  • ✓ StoryGraph runs warmer at 4.04 average
  • ✓ Shortlisted, 2025 British Fantasy Award horror
  • ✓ Pacing flagged by 18 independent Goodreads reviewers

Romance ★★★★☆ 4/5

  • ✓ 22 reviewers single out the yearning specifically
  • ✓ Butch/femme dynamic praised by 21 reviewers
  • ✓ Touch-as-cure gives every scene of desire stakes
  • ✓ Seven readers say it overwhelms the horror

Characters ★★★★☆ 4/5

  • ✓ 70% of StoryGraph readers call them loveable
  • ✓ 94% of readers rate the cast diverse
  • ✓ Sicco family named in 88 of 450 reviews
  • ✓ 28% choose “complicated” on character development

Writing ★★★★☆ 4.2/5

  • ✓ Kirkus, PW and NYTBR all praise the craft
  • ✓ Blurbs from Muir, Armfield and van der Wouden
  • ✓ Co-authorship noticed by two of 270 reviewers
  • ✓ Unnamed country frustrates a handful of readers

Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 4/5

  • ✓ 90% of StoryGraph readers chose “dark”
  • ✓ Race engaged by 50 of 450 reviewers
  • ✓ Family obligation is the real engine
  • ✓ Animal death raised unprompted 17 times

Heat Level ★★★★☆ 4/5

  • ✓ romance.io band 4/5: explicit open door
  • ✓ 60 of 450 reviewers mention the sex
  • ✓ Sexual content flagged graphic by 32 readers
  • ✓ Less frequent than a contemporary romance

Ending ★★★☆☆ 3.4/5

  • ✓ Couple ends together, with a closing epilogue
  • ✓ No reviewer in 450 describes a tragedy
  • ✓ A standalone, with nothing left unresolved
  • ✓ Six reviewers call it rushed or flat

Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.7/5

  • ✓ Atmosphere named by 54 of 450 reviewers
  • ✓ Audiobook runs 10 hours 14 minutes
  • ✓ Library Journal praised Jaclyn Kelso’s narration
  • ✓ Graphic animal death deters a second pass

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑