This post contains affiliate links, including Amazon and Libro.fm. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.
Verdict: A Hollywood boss-and-assistant slow burn with four starred trade reviews and unusually careful consent politics, undercut by a romance that does not land until the last tenth of the book.
Best for: Readers who want workplace politics and a power-imbalance romance that treats the imbalance as a problem rather than a thrill, and who will trade chemistry and heat for restraint and representation.
Heat level: ★★★☆☆ (3/5 — romance.io bands it “Open door”, but readers count a single scene arriving very late)
Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.6/5 — a 3.60 Goodreads average across 35,589 ratings, against four starred trade reviews that never mention the wait)
Tropes: Boss and assistant, slow burn, age gap, workplace romance, an accidental fake-dating rumour, forced proximity, dual POV, found family, celebrity setting.
Something to Talk About by Meryl Wilsner is a standalone contemporary lesbian romance — Wilsner’s 2020 debut for Berkley — set in the writers’ rooms and red carpets of television Hollywood, where Jo Jones, a showrunner with a reputation for coldness, is photographed laughing at something her assistant Emma Kaplan said, and the tabloid rumour that follows collides two women who have spent two years being scrupulously professional with each other.
It holds a 3.60 average across 35,589 Goodreads ratings and 3.59 across 14,192 on StoryGraph, against four starred trade reviews — Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Booklist and Library Journal — plus an NPR notice, an Indie Next pick and a LibraryReads pick. The industry loved it and readers argued about it, and the argument is not about quality. Both halves of that split are worth understanding before you start.
What Is Something to Talk About?
Something to Talk About is a contemporary sapphic slow burn and a workplace novel, and the second half of that description does more work than the first. Hollywood here is a job rather than a fantasy: production politics, a leak to a columnist, a promotion that can be quietly withheld. It is also an age-gap romance between a boss and her direct report, so it inherits a consent problem that most romances in this shape simply enjoy — and this one refuses to.
Emma is short on standing. She worked her way up from the props department, and being famous as somebody’s rumoured girlfriend actively damages ambitions of her own. Jo assumes distance is the same thing as safety — for her work, her privacy and, without ever framing it that way, for Emma. The dual third-person POV buys two people independently deciding that acting on this would be unfair to the other, which is also, precisely, what makes the book so slow.
What Makes This Sapphic Workplace Slow Burn Work
- The power imbalance is treated as a problem: The consent-forward handling of a boss and her assistant is the most consistently praised element, and readers who came in wary of the setup name it first.
- The representation: A Chinese-American lesbian lead and a Jewish bisexual one in a mainstream 2020 romance. StoryGraph readers mark the cast diverse 91% of the time.
- The harassment subplot: Library Journal and Booklist both singled out the #MeToo thread, and readers back them — handled without flinching or wallowing.
- The supporting cast: Emma’s sister Avery draws real affection in the reviews, and Publishers Weekly credited the secondary characters with the book’s depth.
- The prose: Four starred trade reviews and no meaningful editing complaint in 5,468 Goodreads reviews. Whatever divides readers here, it is not craft.
Book Synopsis
Jo Jones runs a television show, which in practice means she runs several hundred people and answers for all of them. She has spent a career being described as cold and has stopped correcting it. Emma Kaplan has been her assistant for two years, having climbed there from the props department, and is good enough that Jo has begun to depend on her in ways neither has named.
Then a photographer catches Jo on a red carpet, mid-laugh, looking at Emma. The picture runs everywhere. Within a day the tabloids have decided they are together, and the timing could hardly be worse — Jo is trying to get a film project off the ground, and Emma is up for a promotion a scandal will quietly kill. Their response is the only one Jo has ever given the press about her private life: no comment.
No comment turns out to be its own kind of answer. The photographers follow them home. Colleagues behave differently in meetings. Someone inside the production starts feeding a columnist details close enough to be someone they both know. Meanwhile a harassment complaint is working through the studio that neither woman can afford to ignore, and the distance Jo has kept for two years is getting harder to justify. They are spending more time together, not less, and both have noticed the rumour describes something beginning to be true — which raises the only question that matters. Is a thing worth having if reaching for it costs the other woman the career she built to get here?
My Review
The best thing about this book is the thing it refuses to do. A romance between a showrunner and her assistant is, in most hands, a power fantasy — the imbalance is the engine and the discomfort the point. Wilsner treats it as an ethical problem to be solved before anyone is allowed to enjoy anything, and both women independently conclude the other has more to lose. Readers who came in braced for the usual thing name this as why they stayed.
The second strength is the workplace itself. This is a Hollywood novel by someone interested in how the machine operates, and the harassment storyline is built into that machine rather than bolted on — the romance and the politics run on the same rails. Across 5,468 Goodreads reviews I could not find the editing complaint that usually dominates a debut.
Where it struggles is the wait, and this is not a minority gripe — it is the dominant complaint by a wide margin, in almost identical words. Readers call it the slowest burn they have encountered and then quantify it, placing the moment the leads get together between 85% and 96% of the way through. Everything else follows: a middle built on a misunderstanding, far more internal monologue than scene work, and an ending with no room left to be a couple.
One expectation to reset, and it decides whether you will like this: it is sold as a romance and reads as a workplace novel with a romance at the end. The relationship is the destination rather than the terrain. If you read romance for the dynamic developing on the page, this will feel starved. If you read for interiority, it does something most of the genre does not attempt. Wilsner is candid about it; their own author bio jokes that these characters “take so long to kiss you want to fling yourself into the sun.”
My honest note: A principled romance that forgets to be a romance until it is nearly over. If slow burn is what you came for, this is the deep end. If you need chemistry on the page to believe in a couple, the ending will not repay the three hundred pages in front of it.
| Element | In Something to Talk About |
|---|---|
| Central relationship | Jo Jones & Emma Kaplan — Hollywood showrunner and her assistant, slow burn across a power gap |
| Core tropes | Boss and assistant, slow burn, age gap, workplace romance, an accidental fake-dating rumour, forced proximity |
| Setting | Contemporary Los Angeles — a working television production, its writers’ rooms, sets and red carpets |
| Heat level | 3/5 — romance.io bands it “Open door”; readers report one scene, arriving very late |
| Series | Standalone, no sequel — complete arc and an HEA, Wilsner’s 2020 debut |
| Content notes | Workplace sexual harassment, misogyny, queerphobia, tabloid intrusion, workplace power imbalance, a brief on-page sex scene |
How Spicy Is Something to Talk About?
A 3/5, and this is the one number on the page readers genuinely disagree about. romance.io bands it “Open door” from 101 ratings, which is accurate as far as it goes — the door does open, and what is behind it is on the page rather than implied. The disagreement is about what the band cannot capture. The Lesbian Review counts a single hot scene, at the end. Amazon reviewers independently describe “the one steamy scene”, say the book “lacks it completely”, and report no sexual tension in the three hundred pages before it. Against them sits a large constituency reading the same absence as the book’s argument, praising it for marking the relationship in milestones of trust rather than sex.
Both readings are correct, which is why the number is contested rather than wrong. Treat the 3/5 as a description of the scene that exists, not of reading toward it. No reviewer flags kink content or anything beyond one conventional love scene. In the same band, Scars Like Wings spreads its heat more evenly, and A Curious Woman has this exact problem.
Who Should Read This Book?
You’ll likely love it if: you read slow burn for the yearning rather than the payoff, you want a power-imbalance romance that takes the imbalance seriously, you like representation that is specific rather than decorative, and you are happy for a romance to be quiet.
You may want to skip it if: you need chemistry you can feel on the page, you lose patience with conflict driven by two people not talking, you want heat spread through a book rather than deposited at the end, or you want real time with the couple once they finally are one.
In short: the most thoughtful boss-and-assistant romance you will find, and the least satisfying to read as a romance.
What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)
Six years on, this book is still being discovered, and not through the channel you would expect. There is no viral moment — it predates the BookTok sapphic boom, and while organic creator videos exist, I found nothing resembling a hit. Its Reddit footprint is real but modest: an r/RomanceBooks search surfaces a few recommendation threads plus one critical discussion thread from 2020 titled “Talk about how bad it is”, with 22 votes and six comments. Reddit was rate-limiting throughout this sweep, so that is the search results, not the arguments inside them. What drives discovery here is old-fashioned: four starred trade reviews, an Indie Next and a LibraryReads pick, the New York Public Library’s Best Books for Adults 2020, NPR’s best of that year, and a long library and backlist life. There is also a Penguin Audio edition, narrated by Jorjeana Marie and Xe Sands across 9 hours 7 minutes, released on publication day and still well regarded.
Prefer audio? Listen to Something to Talk About on Libro.fm — the audiobook shop that supports independent bookstores.
Why readers love it (according to the discourse): The consent politics, first and most consistently — readers repeatedly say they expected the boss-assistant setup to be creepy and it was not. Then the representation: Jo’s Chinese-American identity and Emma’s Judaism are treated as facts about people rather than texture, and StoryGraph readers call the cast diverse 91% of the time and loveable 80%. Avery, Emma’s sister, is the supporting character people volunteer unprompted. And a real constituency loves the restraint itself — for them the absence of sex is the thesis, which is the exact inverse of the loudest complaint.
What readers argue about and complain about: The wait, above everything, in the terms described earlier. Second: chemistry — many readers believe the friendship and not the attraction, and the divide is sharp rather than gradual. Third: the middle conflict, turning on Jo befriending Emma’s sister without mentioning it, which multiple readers call manufactured. Beyond that, recurring notes on the volume of internal monologue, on both leads reading as underdeveloped individually, and on the near-total absence of couple time before the last page. StoryGraph’s readers split the pace 33% slow, 48% medium, 17% fast — a wider spread than the complaints suggest. I could not obtain StoryGraph’s did-not-finish rate or its crowd-sourced content warnings; both sit behind a login, so the content notes above come from romance.io and reader reviews.
The standalone question worth asking first: this one resolves. No series, no sequel, no cliffhanger — the arc closes with an HEA and requires nothing else from you. The question is where you go next in Wilsner’s catalogue, and that depends on which half of the split you landed in. Mistakes Were Made (2022) opens with a sex scene, by the author’s own framing, and Cleat Cute (2023) sits a full band higher at 4/5 “Explicit open door” on romance.io, with a 3.69 Goodreads average across 41,255 ratings. More heat and a higher rating from the same author tells you the wait here was a choice, not a limitation.
Frequently Asked Questions
How spicy is Something to Talk About?
A 3/5. romance.io bands it “Open door”, but readers consistently report a single sex scene in the last tenth of the book. If you want heat spread through a romance, this is not that book.
Does Something to Talk About end on a cliffhanger?
No. It is a standalone with a complete arc and a happily-ever-after, and there is no sequel. The common complaint is the opposite — the couple get together so late there is little room left to enjoy it.
Is the boss-assistant relationship handled well?
Yes, and it is the book’s most praised element. Both women independently treat the power imbalance as a reason not to act, and readers who came in wary of the premise say it is why they kept reading.
Is there an audiobook?
Yes — narrated by Jorjeana Marie and Xe Sands for Penguin Audio, 9 hours 7 minutes, released alongside the book in May 2020. The narration is well regarded, though one listener finds Emma voiced younger than she reads.
Should I read Something to Talk About or Cleat Cute first?
They are unconnected standalones, so either. Start here for restraint and workplace politics; start with Cleat Cute if you want heat, which romance.io rates a full band higher.
If You Loved Something to Talk About, Read These Next
If the wait was the only thing between you and loving this, Cleat Cute is the same author answering that exact complaint — same warmth, far more heat, a couple who get there early. If it was the boss-and-assistant dynamic you wanted more of, Assistant to the CEO runs the same workplace power gap at 5/5 heat, the opposite end of the same idea. And if the long, quiet build is what you loved, A Curious Woman has the same shape — an enormous slow burn and one restrained scene near the end.
For more in this register, browse our age-gap lesbian romance reading list or the full Book Reviews collection.
The Bottom Line
Something to Talk About set out to be a boss-and-assistant romance a reader would not have to apologise for, and it succeeded — the consent politics are careful, the representation is specific, and the harassment storyline earned four starred trade reviews. It is also a romance in which the leads barely touch until the final pages, much of the conflict comes from two people declining to have one conversation, and the couple get almost no time to be a couple. Whether that trade works depends on what you go to romance for, and the 3.60 Goodreads average is what it looks like when a genre’s readers and its reviewers want different things from one book. Check Something to Talk About on Amazon →
The Eikna Overall Ranking
On the Eikna scale, Something to Talk About ranks as a landmark mainstream sapphic debut — principled, warm and genuinely well made, held back by a romance that arrives too late to be enjoyed, and best approached for the workplace and the ethics rather than the heat.
The Evidence Scorecard
Overall ★★★★☆ 3.6/5
- ✓ 3.60 average across 35,589 Goodreads ratings
- ✓ Four starred trade reviews
- ✓ Consent politics are the standout
- ✓ Dominant complaint is the late payoff
Romance ★★★☆☆ 3.4/5
- ✓ Power imbalance handled with real care
- ✓ Yearning is sustained and specific
- ✓ Dual POV shows both sides deciding
- ✓ Many readers never believe the chemistry
Characters ★★★★☆ 3.8/5
- ✓ 80% of StoryGraph readers call them loveable
- ✓ Avery and the supporting cast land
- ✓ 91% mark the cast as diverse
- ✓ 25% say character development is thin
Writing ★★★★☆ 4.1/5
- ✓ Four starred trade reviews for a debut
- ✓ No editing complaint in 5,468 reviews
- ✓ Hollywood procedure is convincingly drawn
- ✓ Heavy on interior monologue, light on scene
Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 3.9/5
- ✓ Harassment subplot lands without wallowing
- ✓ 44% of readers mark it emotional
- ✓ Sisters and friendships carry real weight
- ✓ Manufactured middle conflict costs it
Heat Level ★★★☆☆ 3/5
- ✓ romance.io bands it “Open door”
- ✓ On the page rather than implied
- ✓ Some readers call the restraint the point
- ✓ One scene, in the last tenth
Ending ★★★★☆ 3.7/5
- ✓ Complete arc, earned HEA
- ✓ True standalone, no cliffhanger
- ✓ Resolution is emotionally consistent
- ✓ Almost no couple time before it closes
Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.5/5
- ✓ Lighthearted for 82% of readers
- ✓ Audiobook is a strong second pass
- ✓ Comfort read once you know the wait ends
- ✓ The build is long to sit through twice
Affiliate disclosure: the store buttons below are affiliate links (Amazon, Bookshop.org, Libro.fm and Audible). As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, and we may also earn a small commission from the other stores, at no extra cost to you.
6 thoughts on “Something to Talk About Review — Is It Worth Reading?”