Verdict: A tender, formally ambitious sapphic cosmic horror romance with some of the most striking prose in indie sapphic fiction, undercut by two narrators who sound like the same person.

Best for: Readers who want a slow, literary monster-as-metaphor romance about trauma, disability and being remade, and who can forgive a book that withholds plot for a hundred pages.

Heat level: ★★★★☆ (4/5 — explicit open door)

Rating: ★★★★☆ (3.6/5 — a 3.85 Goodreads average, a 12% did-not-finish rate, and one structural complaint that recurs across independent reviewers)

Tropes: Cosmic horror romance, monster girlfriend, epistolary dual timeline, hurt/comfort and caretaking, slow burn, age gap, trauma recovery, body horror, disability representation, found family.

Providence Girls: A Sapphic Horror Romance by Morgan Dante is a self-published standalone — not part of a series, despite how often it gets shelved with one — a piece of sapphic paranormal and fantasy romance built directly out of H.P. Lovecraft’s “The Dunwich Horror,” “The Thing on the Doorstep” and The Shadow Over Innsmouth, set in the Massachusetts hill country and on the coast outside East Providence, Rhode Island, in which Lavinia Whateley runs from the townsfolk who mean to sacrifice her and lands in the house of Asenath Waite, a stoic woman with strange scars on her neck who is quietly turning into something from the sea.

It carries a 3.85 average across 852 Goodreads ratings and a 3.81 on StoryGraph across 548 reviews, it won Best Historical Fiction at the 2023 Queer Indie Awards, and the author has said publicly that it passed 10,000 copies sold on Halloween 2024 and has since gone past 12,000 — roughly 62% of her total sales. It also has a 12% did-not-finish rate and a review section that divides almost exactly down the middle of a single craft decision. Both halves of that split are worth understanding before you start.

What Is Providence Girls About?

Providence Girls is cosmic horror and it is a romance, and it takes both halves of that seriously rather than using one as decoration for the other. It is also historical — early twentieth-century New England, with the insularity, religiosity and small-town cruelty that implies — and it is a retelling, which means it inherits two women Lovecraft wrote as vessels and plot devices and hands them interiority instead. Readers on StoryGraph tag it dark at 82% and emotional at 80%, and 73% call it character-driven over plot.

Lavinia is introduced through what has already been done to her: a body she was never allowed to own, a pregnancy she did not choose, a town that decided she was a sacrifice. Asenath — Azzie — is introduced through what she withholds, which is nearly everything, including the fact that her body is changing in ways she cannot stop. The book runs on a dual structure, one strand a letter written fifteen years after the fact and the other a contemporaneous account, and that structure is both the most interesting thing about the novel and the source of its loudest complaint.

What Makes This Sapphic Cosmic Horror Romance Work

• The prose: Named first and most often by the readers who love it. The Lesbrary’s Sritama Sen calls it “exquisitely poetic and beautiful,” and Goodreads reviewers reach repeatedly for words like gorgeous, lyrical and atmospheric.
• The monster as metaphor, handled with restraint: Reviewers consistently praise the book for letting Azzie’s transformation carry queerness, trauma and acquired disability at once without flattening into a single tidy symbol.
• Body horror written beautifully: Multiple readers note that the grotesque is rendered in language pretty enough that it lands rather than numbing — a specific and unusual technical achievement in dark sapphic fiction.
• Caretaking as the romance engine: The love story is built from gardening, films and small acts of tending. 73% of StoryGraph readers mark strong character development and 73% call the characters loveable.
• Two middle-aged, damaged, unglamorous leads: Lavinia is explicitly written as middle-aged, and readers name that as a reason the tenderness reads as earned rather than decorative.

Book Synopsis

Lavinia Whateley has spent her life in a hill town that treats her as something owed to it. When the townsfolk decide that Halloween is the night she settles the debt, she runs into the woods with nothing, and very nearly dies there. What finds her is not rescue in any warm sense: a silent, watchful woman carries her out and installs her in a cottage on the coast outside East Providence, and asks her almost nothing.

Asenath Waite — Azzie — keeps her distance the way people do when distance is the only thing that has ever kept them safe. She has scars along the side of her neck that she will not explain, a past she has clearly buried in pieces, and a house arranged for one. Lavinia, who has never been permitted to want anything, discovers she is allowed to sit in a garden, to be fed, to be left alone. The two of them build something out of that arrangement slowly, in the small increments available to women who have both learned that speed is dangerous.

Then Azzie’s body starts to change. The scars are gills. Whatever her father did to her, whatever the Outer Gods have already decided, is not finished with her, and it is accelerating. Fifteen years later, alone in a cottage, Lavinia is writing all of this down and addressing it to a woman who is not there to read it. The question the novel runs on is not whether Azzie will become the thing she is becoming — she will — but what a person is supposed to do with love once the beloved has stopped being human, and why the woman telling the story is telling it alone.

My Review

The concept is the best thing on this shelf and I want to say so plainly. Taking Lavinia Whateley and Asenath Waite — two women Lovecraft wrote as instruments, one a breeding vessel and one a stolen body — and putting them in a room together is a genuinely excellent idea, and Dante executes the emotional logic of it properly. Azzie’s transformation does three jobs at once, standing in for coming out, for trauma that reshapes you permanently, and for acquired disability, and it never collapses into a single neat reading. That is hard, and it is done well.

The prose is the other real accomplishment. Line for line this is the most ambitious writing I have covered from an indie sapphic press this year, and the body horror in particular is rendered in language beautiful enough that the grotesque registers as awe instead of disgust. Readers who love this book name the sentences first, every time. The romance is built out of tending rather than tension — food, gardens, films, the slow permission to occupy space — and for two characters this damaged that is the only version of it that would have been believable.

Where it struggles is not a matter of taste, and I want to be careful about that, because the prose complaint is a matter of taste and this one is not. The book is told in two strands, a retrospective letter and a contemporaneous account, and readers report over and over that they cannot tell the two women apart. This is the single most repeated criticism in the reviews and it comes from readers across the star range, not just the low ones: they describe backtracking to work out who is speaking, and one StoryGraph reader who abandoned it at 39% says flatly that “The two main characters have identical voices.” Because both strands are written in the past tense in the same register, the formal split stops paying for itself. Around that sit the secondary problems: the pace is slow — 50% of StoryGraph readers mark it slow against 7% fast — there is very little plot in the first third, and one Goodreads reviewer calls the opening half “nearly unreadable.” StoryGraph’s 12% did-not-finish rate is high, and length is not the reason; at around 250 pages this is a short book that people put down anyway.

Two expectations to reset. First, it is sold as horror and a good number of readers finish it feeling it was a romance with horror imagery — the dread is atmospheric and interior rather than escalating, and if you came for cosmic horror with teeth you may find it more elegiac than frightening. Second, this is not the emotional register the “spicy romantasy” shelf implies. More than one reader describes it as too bleak and unrelenting in its trauma, and the content list is heavy in a way the cover does not advertise. If “cosmic horror” is what drew you, calibrate downward; if the trauma content is what worried you, take it seriously rather than assuming the romance softens it.

My honest note: A five-star idea and four-star sentences let down by a three-star structural decision that a developmental editor would have caught. If you read for voice and image, this will be one of the best things you pick up all autumn. If you need to know who is talking, the first hundred pages will fight you the whole way.

Element	In Providence Girls
Central relationship	Lavinia Whateley & Asenath “Azzie” Waite — two survivors of separate Lovecraft stories, caretaking slow burn
Core tropes	Cosmic horror romance, monster girlfriend, epistolary dual timeline, hurt/comfort, slow burn, age gap, body horror
Setting	The Massachusetts hill country and the coast outside East Providence, Rhode Island, early twentieth century
Heat level	4/5 — explicit open door, but infrequent
Series	Standalone — complete in one volume, no sequel and none announced
Content notes	Graphic body horror, rape and incest; past sexual abuse and traumatic pregnancy; ableism, including toward people with albinism; death and child death; emetophobia; body dysmorphia; suicidal ideation

How Dark and Spicy Is Providence Girls?

A 4/5. romance.io places it in its “explicit open door” band, one step below the top, and that matches what readers report: the scenes are on the page and they are graphic, but there are only about three of them by one reviewer’s count, and nobody treats the heat as the reason to read this book. It is worth flagging that romance.io’s entry rests on just 14 ratings, and that I Heart SapphFic independently classifies the heat as medium. Both readings point the same direction — explicit but sparse.

The darkness is the part that needs advance warning, and it is not the cosmic kind. StoryGraph’s crowd-sourced warnings list body horror, rape and incest as graphic, with ableism, death and sexual assault as moderate, and the author publishes her own list naming past sexual abuse, a traumatic pregnancy, emetophobia and body dysmorphia. That material is backstory rather than on-page action, but it saturates the book. No reviewer I found flags kink content beyond the transformation itself. If you want comparable heat in a much lighter register, Her Spell That Binds Me and Tryst Six Venom both sit a band higher with none of the trauma load.

Who Should Read This Book?

You’ll likely love it if: you read for prose above everything, you want the monster metaphor taken seriously as a statement about disability and queerness, you like a romance built from caretaking rather than conflict, and you are happy in a book where very little happens for a long time.

You may want to skip it if: ornate prose reads as purple to you, you need to know whose head you are in without working for it, you want cosmic horror that actually escalates, or you have limited tolerance for sustained trauma content with no comic relief.

In short: extraordinary sentences and a genuinely moving central idea, wrapped in a structure that loses a real number of readers before it can land.

What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)

There is no viral moment here and there never was one. I found no BookTok footprint for the title, no coverage in Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, Library Journal or Booklist, no Lambda recognition, and exactly one sapphic blog review — the Lesbrary’s, by Sritama Sen, who gave it five stars. Jude in the Stars, LezReviewBooks and Bookish Sapphic have nothing on it. Reddit was unreachable from this session, so I cannot report on its footprint there either way. What the book has instead is word of mouth that has quietly outperformed all of that: the author says it crossed 10,000 copies on Halloween 2024 and has since passed 12,000, making it roughly 62% of her career sales, and it was picked up by two subscription boxes, Rainbow Crate and Queers Who Bite, which is how a lot of these readers met it. Then Tantor Media licensed the audiobook, released 11 February 2025, narrated by April Doty and Ellie Gossage across 7 hours 49 minutes — a runtime Libro.fm’s own page still lists as TBA, but which OverDrive and audiobooks.com both give to the minute. That is a self-published cosmic horror romance moving into professional audio distribution off nothing but reader recommendation, and it is why the ratings are still climbing three years after release.

Prefer audio? Listen to Providence Girls on Libro.fm — the audiobook shop that supports independent bookstores.

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.

Why readers love it (according to the discourse): The writing, first and by a distance — “poetic,” “lyrical” and “gorgeous” are the recurring words, and the Lesbrary review lands in the same place. Then the thematic handling: reviewers repeatedly single out the way the transformation holds trauma recovery, bodily autonomy and disability together without becoming a lecture, and several name the disability material specifically as the reason the book stayed with them. The tenderness gets its own praise — the domesticity, the gardening, the sense of two people learning to be safe — and StoryGraph’s 73% strong-character-development and 73% loveable-characters figures back that up. The body horror is admired rather than tolerated. And there is a real minority who praise the epistolary structure as intimate and nostalgic, which is worth naming because it is the exact element the loudest complaint is about.

What readers argue about and complain about: Indistinguishable narrators, above everything. Both timelines are written in the past tense in near-identical registers, so the letter and the diary read the same, and reviewer after reviewer — including several who rated the book three and four stars — describes losing track of who is speaking and having to reread to recover it. One reader who abandoned it at 39% gives that as the whole reason. Second: pace and plot. Half of StoryGraph’s readers mark it slow-paced, and complaints cluster on the first hundred pages having no forward motion and very little exposition; the 12% did-not-finish rate is the number that quantifies it. Third: the prose divides genuinely. The same ornate style that the five-star reviews call beautiful, the two-star reviews call overly flowery and impenetrable, and this is a taste split rather than a craft failure — there is no synthesis available. Fourth: readers wanting more horror and more mythos. Several say the Lovecraft material is set up and then underexplored, that they would classify the book as romance rather than horror, and at least one reader unfamiliar with the source stories found the allusions simply passed them by. Beyond that, more than one reviewer names the bleakness as excessive, and a smaller group finds the ending anticlimactic given how heavily the framing device foreshadows a catastrophe.

The standalone question worth asking first: it is a standalone, it resolves, and it requires nothing else — but do not go in expecting a conventional happily-ever-after. Readers describe the ending as bittersweet and hopeful rather than triumphant, and romance.io tags the book for a nontraditional HEA. That is a deliberate choice, not a failure of nerve, and it is the single most useful thing to know before starting. If you finish it and want more Dante, her second most-rated book, The Saint of Heartbreak, actually sits a little higher at 3.95 across 757 Goodreads ratings, and Sacrament holds 3.94 on a much smaller sample. Her New Age Gothic series opener, A Flame in the Night, is the weakest-rated of her longer works at 3.49 across 502 — useful to know, since it is the one a series-minded reader would reach for first.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Providence Girls have a happy ending?

Not a conventional one. Readers describe the ending as bittersweet but hopeful, and romance.io tags the book for a nontraditional HEA. If a guaranteed romance-genre happily-ever-after is a requirement for you, go in with that expectation adjusted.

How spicy is Providence Girls?

A 4/5. romance.io rates it “explicit open door,” one band below the top. The scenes are graphic but sparse — one reviewer counts three — and I Heart SapphFic independently calls the heat medium.

Do you need to have read H.P. Lovecraft first?

No, but it helps. The book reworks characters from “The Dunwich Horror,” “The Thing on the Doorstep” and The Shadow Over Innsmouth, and at least one reviewer says the allusions landed flat for them without that background. The emotional story works on its own.

Is it actually horror, or is it a romance?

Both, with the balance tipped toward romance. The body horror is graphic and central, but the dread is atmospheric rather than escalating, and multiple readers say they would shelve it as romance. StoryGraph readers mark it 82% dark and 80% emotional.

How does it handle Lovecraft’s racism?

The book does not address it directly, and neither do the reader reviews — though StoryGraph readers do list racism as a minor content warning. Dante has spoken about it in interview, calling Lovecraft “flawed and deeply bigoted” while arguing that The Shadow Over Innsmouth reads as a coming-out story, and her stated project is returning agency to the women he wrote as objects.

Is there an audiobook?

Yes — Tantor Media, released 11 February 2025, narrated by April Doty and Ellie Gossage, running 7 hours 49 minutes. Dual narration is a sensible fix for the book’s biggest problem, and at least one reader says they finished it in audio after doubting they could have on the page.

Is Providence Girls part of a series?

No. It is a complete standalone with no sequel and none announced. Morgan Dante does write series — New Age Gothic is one — but this is not part of any of them.

If You Loved Providence Girls, Read These Next

Nothing on the site is a close match for this one yet, which is itself a comment on how unusual it is. The nearest we have is Her Spell That Binds Me, which shares the gothic atmosphere and the sense of a closed, hostile world, though it trades the literary prose for pace. If it was the explicit heat you wanted more of rather than the horror, Tryst Six Venom sits a full band higher with none of the trauma load. For the actual read-alikes — literary sapphic body horror and monster romance — we have no reviews up yet, so browse the paranormal and fantasy lesbian romance category, the spicy sapphic romantasy guide, or the full Book Reviews collection.

The Bottom Line

Providence Girls sets out to give two of Lovecraft’s discarded women a life, and it largely succeeds. The prose is genuinely beautiful, the transformation metaphor carries real weight about trauma and disability, and the caretaking romance is tender in a way that very few horror novels manage. It is also structurally confused, near-plotless for its first third, and unrelenting enough in its trauma content that a meaningful number of readers put it down. Whether that trade works depends entirely on whether you read for sentences or for story — the reader who reads for sentences will find one of the best indie sapphic books of the last three years, and the reader who needs to know who is speaking will spend a hundred pages annoyed. Check Providence Girls on Amazon →

The Eikna Overall Ranking

On the Eikna scale, Providence Girls ranks as a literary indie sapphic cosmic horror romance — formally ambitious and beautifully written, held back by two narrators who sound alike, and best approached for the prose and the monster metaphor rather than for plot or scares.

The Evidence Scorecard

Overall ★★★★☆ 3.6/5

• ✓ 3.85 average across 852 Goodreads ratings
• ✓ 3.81 on StoryGraph across 548 reviews
• ✓ Over 12,000 copies sold self-published
• ✓ 12% did-not-finish rate on StoryGraph

Romance ★★★★☆ 4/5

• ✓ Caretaking and domesticity as the engine
• ✓ Two middle-aged leads, tenderness earned
• ✓ Monster metaphor deepens rather than decorates
• ✓ Blurred voices undercut it as a two-hander

Characters ★★★★☆ 3.7/5

• ✓ 73% mark strong character development
• ✓ 73% character-driven over plot
• ✓ Lovecraft’s objects given real interiority
• ✓ Readers cannot tell the two apart

Writing ★★★★☆ 3.5/5

• ✓ Most-praised element by a distance
• ✓ Body horror rendered beautifully, not numbingly
• ✓ The Lesbrary calls it exquisitely poetic
• ✓ Two timelines in one identical register

Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 4.1/5

• ✓ 82% dark, 80% emotional on StoryGraph
• ✓ Disability and trauma material lands hard
• ✓ 69% say character flaws are central
• ✓ More than one reader finds it unrelenting

Heat Level ★★★★☆ 4/5

• ✓ romance.io band: explicit open door
• ✓ On-page and graphic when it arrives
• ✓ Intimacy serves the trauma arc
• ✓ Roughly three scenes; not the draw

Ending ★★★☆☆ 3.4/5

• ✓ Complete standalone, nothing left dangling
• ✓ Bittersweet and hopeful, deliberately so
• ✓ Framing device pays off thematically
• ✓ Nontraditional HEA; some call it anticlimactic

Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.8/5

• ✓ Around 250 pages, an easy return
• ✓ Prose rewards a second, slower pass
• ✓ Dual-narrator audio clarifies the structure
• ✓ Bleakness rules out comfort rereading

Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.