A Star-Cursed Heart Review — Is It Worth Reading?

This post contains affiliate links, including Amazon and Libro.fm. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, at no extra cost to you.

Verdict: A genuinely original 2026 curse premise — The Scarlet Letter rewritten as a sapphic romance — with two trade reviews calling it irresistible and a readership that keeps saying it lost them somewhere in the middle. Best for: Readers who want a smart literary conceit and generational-trauma themes in their romantasy, and who will follow a non-linear timeline without needing it to hold their hand. Heat level: ★★★★☆ (4/5 — our editorial estimate; romance.io’s gauge is still empty for this title) Rating: ★★★☆☆ (3.3/5 — a 3.27 Goodreads average across only 102 ratings, with a structural complaint the trade reviews never mention) Tropes: Lovers cursed into enemies, generational curse, star-crossed lovers, second chance, witches, forbidden love, fate versus free will, contemporary fantasy, standalone. A Star-Cursed Heart by Annie Mare is a standalone sapphic contemporary fantasy published by Ace in May 2026, in which Lucy Prynne and Ashes Steadfast — descendants of two families bound by a deal one desperate man made with the devil in the run-up to the Salem witch trials — have been cursed for four hundred years to be mortal enemies despite loving each other, and set out to break it. Three months after publication it has a 3.27 average across just 102 Goodreads ratings and a 3.5 across 87 StoryGraph reviews. Both Publishers Weekly and Library Journal reviewed it warmly and without reservation. Those two pictures do not match, and the gap between them is the most useful thing this review can show you.

What Is A Star-Cursed Heart About?

The premise is smarter than the romantasy label implies. This is a direct, sustained engagement with The Scarlet Letter — every chapter opens with a Nathaniel Hawthorne excerpt, Hester Prynne herself appears in the narrative, and the surname Lucy carries is a deliberate lineage callback rather than a wink. The setting is contemporary America with the Salem-era backstory delivered through flashback, not a secondary world. Correcting one thing readers often assume: this is single POV, told close to Ashes, with historical interludes rather than a Lucy perspective. That choice shapes everything about how the book reads. Alongside the two leads is a supporting cast that Library Journal accurately describes as a divinatory drag queen, a bartender faith healer and a skeletal mini dachshund — the last of whom, Helegar, a partially decomposed three-hundred-year-old dog, is the single most beloved thing in the reviews.

What Makes This Cursed Sapphic Romantasy Work

• The inversion: this is not enemies-to-lovers. It is lovers forced into enmity by magic — the curse is happening to the romance rather than around it, which is a genuinely fresher structure than the trope it is shelved beside.
• The Hawthorne device: readers who liked this book liked the chapter epigraphs specifically, and several say the Scarlet Letter conceit is executed with real care rather than borrowed for the name.
• The chemistry: the push and pull of two people who love each other while being compelled to fight is the element readers praise most consistently, across both positive and mixed reviews.
• The themes: both trade reviews single out generational trauma and inheritance. Publishers Weekly calls the examination of family legacy deep; Library Journal frames the book as a queer reclamation built on forgiveness and repair.
• Helegar: yes, really. A three-hundred-year-old undead dachshund is named in review after review, and Library Journal put him in their write-up too.

Book Synopsis

Four hundred years ago, in the months before Salem started killing its women, a desperate man named Faithful Steadfast made a bargain with something that should not have been bargained with. The deal saved him. It also bound two families to each other in the worst possible way. Ashes Steadfast has lived her whole life inside the consequence. Every generation, a Steadfast and a Prynne find each other, love each other, and are turned by the curse into enemies who cannot stop tearing each other apart. There is no version of the story where it ends well, because there never has been. Lucy Prynne carries the other half of it. Together they decide to do the thing none of their ancestors managed — to work out what was actually agreed to in 1692, and break it — which means going back through four centuries of a family history neither of them was told honestly. The question the book runs on is not whether these two can fall in love. They already have, repeatedly, for generations. It is whether love can survive being magically converted into hatred, and whether anything either woman does can undo a deal she never made.

My Review

The idea is excellent, and I want to be clear about that before the criticism, because the idea is genuinely novel in a subgenre that has been recycling the same three tropes for two years. Taking The Scarlet Letter — a novel about a woman punished by her community for love — and rebuilding it as a four-hundred-year sapphic curse is a real literary move, not a marketing hook. The Hawthorne epigraphs work. Hester Prynne appearing inside the story works. The inversion works too: these women already love each other, and the magic is what makes them enemies, which is a considerably more interesting engine than the trope it sits next to on the shelf. The chemistry delivers as well. Readers who otherwise had problems with this book almost uniformly exempt Lucy and Ashes from them, and the supporting cast is the kind of eccentric that could have been twee and mostly is not — a divinatory drag queen, a faith-healing bartender, and Helegar, a three-hundred-year-old partially rotted dachshund who has done more for this book’s word of mouth than any marketing campaign. Where it struggles is legibility, and this is the dominant complaint by an enormous margin. Across the reviews I read, some form of the word “confusing” appears in thirteen separate reviews, “disjointed” in five, and three readers gave up entirely — one at twelve per cent. The specific charge is consistent: the non-linear timeline, the flashback structure and the curse mechanics are hard to hold in your head, and one reader puts the point at which things start making sense at around forty-five per cent. Two independent blog reviewers who both liked the book raise the same thing, one noting that the shifting timelines demand real attention. That is four separate source types converging on one structural problem. The related complaint is the resolution. Several readers describe the curse’s actual undoing as underexplained or anticlimactic — emotionally the book lands a genuine happy ending, but a number of readers finished it unclear on how the mechanics they had spent 352 pages tracking were resolved. One expectation to reset, and it is about the evidence rather than the book: Publishers Weekly called it irresistible and Library Journal called it a joyfully queer reclamation, and neither mentioned the confusion once. Not as a caveat, not in passing. When two trade outlets publish unreserved praise and thirteen readers independently reach for the same word, the readers are describing something real that professional reviewers reading on deadline did not experience the same way. Trust the pattern, not either source alone. My honest note: The best premise in 2026 sapphic romantasy attached to a structure a lot of readers could not follow. If you read literary fiction happily and like working for a timeline, this may be your book of the year; if you want a romantasy that carries you, it will fight you in the middle.

Element	In A Star-Cursed Heart
Central relationship	Lucy Prynne & Ashes Steadfast — descendants of two cursed families, lovers forced into enmity
Core tropes	Lovers cursed into enemies, generational curse, star-crossed lovers, fate versus free will, witches
Setting	Contemporary America, with flashbacks to the Salem witch trials and a sustained Scarlet Letter framework
Heat level	4/5 — our editorial estimate; StoryGraph files sexual content as graphic, romance.io has no rating yet
Series	Standalone by all official metadata — complete arc and an HEA; no sequel announced
Content notes	Graphic sexual content, religious bigotry and panic attacks; animal death, chronic illness and mental illness; rape, terminal illness and violence in the background

How Spicy Is A Star-Cursed Heart?

Our estimate is 4/5, and it comes with an unusual caveat: there is no published heat rating for this book anywhere. romance.io has an entry but its steam gauge is empty — only two people have rated the book there, far below the threshold to display a band. So this number is ours rather than a database’s. What it is built on: StoryGraph’s crowd-sourced content warnings place sexual content in the graphic tier, which is their highest, and multiple early readers confirm on-page explicit content, with at least one describing the book simply as having spice. That combination puts it comfortably in explicit open-door territory. Treat the number as provisional and expect it to firm up as the ratings accumulate. If you want a verified heat rating in the same neighbourhood, Her Spell That Binds Me sits at a confirmed 5/5 and Pirates of Aletharia at a confirmed 4/5.

Who Should Read This Book?

You’ll likely love it if: you want a premise nobody else is doing, you enjoy literary intertextuality and will actually read the epigraphs, you like generational-trauma themes handled seriously, and a non-linear timeline is a pleasure rather than an obstacle. You may want to skip it if: you need a plot you can follow without effort, you want curse mechanics explained cleanly, you dislike single-POV when both leads are interesting, or you would rather wait until a book this new has more than a hundred ratings behind it. In short: the most interesting idea on this shelf, delivered in a structure that lost a meaningful share of its readers along the way.

What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)

Three months out, the honest headline is that almost nobody has read this book yet. Around two hundred people have rated it across every platform combined — 102 on Goodreads, 87 on StoryGraph, ten on Amazon and two on romance.io — which is thin enough that a dozen new reviews could move the average meaningfully. There is no BookTok presence to speak of: the hashtag shows eight total interactions and a keyword search surfaces exactly one video with twenty-three likes, from an account with no connection to the author. There is no Reddit conversation. Amazon has not accumulated enough reviews to generate its “Customers say” summary. What the book does have is institutional support that most romantasy never gets — Publishers Weekly in February calling it a sweeping sapphic tale of generational trauma and boundary-breaking love, Library Journal in April calling it a joyfully queer reclamation of love, identity and family, and a slot in Autostraddle’s most-anticipated queer books for May 2026. Kirkus and Booklist did not review it. And Ace put a same-day Penguin Audio edition out, narrated by Natalie Naudus across nine and a half hours, which is a real vote of confidence. Why readers love it (according to the discourse): The premise, first — readers consistently name the cursed-lovers inversion as the reason they picked it up and the reason they finished. Then the Lucy and Ashes dynamic, which even critical reviewers exempt from their complaints: the push and pull of two people who love each other while compelled to fight is what the book does best. The Scarlet Letter framework draws genuine admiration, with several readers naming the Hawthorne chapter epigraphs specifically as a device that worked. The supporting cast lands, and Helegar the undead dachshund has become the book’s unofficial mascot — named in multiple reader reviews and in Library Journal’s own summary. And 79% of StoryGraph readers call the characters loveable, with 95% flagging the cast as diverse. What readers argue about and complain about: Confusion, overwhelmingly. Some form of the word appears in thirteen separate reviews, “disjointed” in five, and three readers did not finish — one abandoning it at twelve per cent. The mechanism is consistently described: shifting timelines, layered flashbacks and curse rules that take too long to cohere, with one reader putting the moment things click at roughly forty-five per cent. This is triangulated across four independent source types — Goodreads, Amazon, and two blog reviewers who liked the book and still raised it. Second: the resolution, which several describe as underexplained or anticlimactic, leaving them unclear how the curse was actually broken. Third, and quieter: some readers wanted Lucy’s point of view, since the single-POV structure keeps one half of a two-hander at arm’s length. Set against all of it, the trade reviews contain no reservations whatsoever — the confusion complaint appears in neither PW nor LJ, which is the sharpest professional-versus-reader divergence on this site. The standalone question worth asking first: every official signal says standalone — no series name, no numbering, no announced sequel — and the arc closes with an HEA. A minority of readers read the loose worldbuilding threads as sequel setup, but nothing supports that yet. Worth knowing that Annie Mare is not a debut author despite this reading like one: she co-writes the Prairie Nightingale mysteries with her wife Ruthie Knox and queer romance with her as Mae Marvel, and her solo Ace debut was Cosmic Love at the Multiverse Hair Salon in 2025. This is her second solo novel, not her first.

Frequently Asked Questions

How spicy is A Star-Cursed Heart?

Our estimate is 4/5, and it is an estimate rather than a published rating — romance.io has an entry but its steam gauge is empty, with only two ratings. StoryGraph’s crowd-sourced warnings place sexual content in the graphic tier and early readers confirm on-page explicit content.

Is A Star-Cursed Heart a standalone?

Yes by every official signal — no series name, no numbering and no announced sequel, with a complete arc and a happily-ever-after. A minority of readers read some unresolved worldbuilding as sequel setup, but nothing confirms it.

Is A Star-Cursed Heart based on The Scarlet Letter?

Directly, and more thoroughly than a nod. Each chapter opens with a Nathaniel Hawthorne excerpt, Hester Prynne appears in the narrative, and Lucy’s surname is a deliberate lineage callback. The curse originates with a Salem-era deal made before the witch trials.

Why do readers say A Star-Cursed Heart is confusing?

Because of the structure rather than the prose. Shifting timelines, layered flashbacks and curse rules that take a long time to cohere are named in thirteen separate reviews, with one reader putting the point where it clicks at around forty-five per cent. Notably, neither trade review mentions this at all.

Is there an audiobook of A Star-Cursed Heart?

Yes — narrated by Natalie Naudus for Penguin Audio, running nine hours and twenty-nine minutes, released the same day as the print edition. Listener commentary is too thin so far to say whether the audio eases the timeline problem.

If You Loved A Star-Cursed Heart, Read These Next

If the curse premise is what drew you, The Honey Witch runs a gentler version of the same idea — a witch cursed never to be loved — in a cottagecore historical register. If it was the dark magic and the compelled rivalry, Her Spell That Binds Me is the higher-heat version. And for literary intertextuality and gothic atmosphere done with vampires, An Education in Malice is the closest tonal match on this site. For more in this register, browse our guide to sapphic romantasy books or the full Book Reviews collection.

The Bottom Line

A Star-Cursed Heart has the most interesting premise in 2026 sapphic romantasy and I would like more books to try what it tries. Rebuilding The Scarlet Letter as a four-hundred-year sapphic curse is a genuine idea, the Hawthorne framework is executed with care, Lucy and Ashes have real chemistry, and two trade outlets liked it enough to say so without qualification. It is also structurally hard to follow in a way thirteen separate readers named independently, resolves its central mechanic more vaguely than it earned, and keeps half its central pair at POV distance. At 102 ratings it is too early to call — but if the premise appeals, it is worth your attention now rather than after the discourse settles. Check A Star-Cursed Heart on Amazon →

The Eikna Overall Ranking

On the Eikna scale, A Star-Cursed Heart ranks as the most original premise in current sapphic romantasy — literary, thematically serious and trade-endorsed, undercut by a timeline structure that lost a real share of its readers, and best approached by people who enjoy doing some of the work themselves.

The Evidence Scorecard

Overall ★★★☆☆ 3.3/5

• ✓ 3.27 average across only 102 Goodreads ratings
• ✓ Publishers Weekly and Library Journal both positive
• ✓ Autostraddle most-anticipated selection
• ✓ Confusion complaint recurs in thirteen reviews

Romance ★★★★☆ 3.9/5

• ✓ Cursed-lovers inversion is genuinely fresh
• ✓ Chemistry exempted even by critical reviewers
• ✓ Push-pull sustained across the book
• ✓ Single POV keeps Lucy at a distance

Characters ★★★★☆ 3.7/5

• ✓ 79% of readers call the cast loveable
• ✓ 95% flag the cast as diverse
• ✓ Helegar named in review after review
• ✓ Lucy underserved by the POV choice

Writing ★★★☆☆ 3/5

• ✓ Hawthorne epigraphs genuinely well used
• ✓ Scarlet Letter framework carefully built
• ✓ Prose itself draws no complaints
• ✓ Timeline structure defeats many readers

Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 3.8/5

• ✓ 59% of readers mark it emotional
• ✓ Generational trauma praised by both trade reviews
• ✓ Four centuries of loss give real weight
• ✓ Confusion blunts the emotional beats

Heat Level ★★★★☆ 4/5

• ✓ StoryGraph files sexual content as graphic
• ✓ Early readers confirm on-page content
• ✓ Explicit open-door territory
• ✓ Our estimate — romance.io gauge still empty

Ending ★★★☆☆ 3.2/5

• ✓ Emotional HEA lands for both leads
• ✓ Standalone arc closes completely
• ✓ Four-hundred-year setup gets a real payoff
• ✓ Curse resolution called underexplained

Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 3.5/5

• ✓ Hawthorne layering rewards a second pass
• ✓ Timeline makes more sense knowing the ending
• ✓ Natalie Naudus narrates the audio edition
• ✓ Too new for reread patterns to exist

Affiliate disclosure: the store buttons below are affiliate links (Amazon, Bookshop.org, Libro.fm and Audible). As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases, and we may also earn a small commission from the other stores, at no extra cost to you.

More like this: browse every sapphic witch romance we have verified, from cozy small-town witches to dark covens, with heat and endings labelled.