Verdict: A 510-page reverse-isekai romance in which a twelfth-century paladin lands in modern Seattle and falls for a chef who talks about everything in terms of food — strange, warm and genuinely original, let down by editing that readers name outright and a plot that wanders.
Best for: Readers who want a big, odd, comforting fantasy about feeding people and finding a purpose, who like fish-out-of-water displacement done sincerely, and who do not need explicit heat or a tight plot.
Heat level: ★★★☆☆ (3/5 — romance.io rates it open door, and several readers wish there were more)
Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.1/5 — a 4.39 Goodreads average with a craft complaint its own fans keep raising)
Tropes: Reverse isekai, time travel, fish out of water, destined bond, hearth witchery, found family, homeless-community care, cooking and food magic, gentle heroine and warrior heroine, series opener.
Sweet Paladin is Alex Washoe’s self-published opener to In the Queerness of Time — a 510-page sapphic fantasy romance set in Seattle’s Fremont district, where Holly Milan, a celebrity chef who walked away from a Michelin star to run a pay-what-you-can diner, meets Akachi of Asphodel, a knight of the Order of Sophia whose city was destroyed by Crusaders in the twelfth century and who arrives in the twenty-first with nothing but a prayer that was answered too literally.
It holds a 4.39 average across 127 Goodreads ratings and 4.6 across 166 on Amazon, with 59% of Goodreads ratings at five stars — among the highest ratios on this site. The interesting thing is that the enthusiasm and the criticism come from the same reviews: readers who loved it are also the ones naming the editing and the shape of the plot. Both halves of that split are worth understanding before you start.
What Is Sweet Paladin About?
This is time-travel fantasy in its rarer direction. Most portal stories send a modern reader into the past, where the fun is competence turned into helplessness; Washoe reverses it, dropping a trained medieval knight into a city of traffic, smartphones and municipal bureaucracy, where her skills are useless and her convictions are not. Readers reach for the word isekai, and specifically reverse isekai, because that is exactly the machinery — and it means the book’s comedy and its pathos come from the same source.
Holly is introduced through excess rather than lack: she has already had the career, the restaurant and the rich New York boyfriend, and she gave all of it up because none of it fed anyone who was actually hungry. Akachi arrives through failure — she did not save her city or her sisters in the Order, and she wakes up homeless in a world with no place for a paladin. The book puts a woman who cannot stop feeding people next to a woman who has lost everyone she was sworn to protect, which is a better romance premise than the cover suggests.
What Makes This Sapphic Time-Travel Fantasy Romance Work
- Holly’s voice: She describes the entire world in terms of food, and readers single it out as the funniest thing in the book — one review reports laughing out loud at the hearth witch who cannot stop talking in recipes.
- The displacement: Akachi’s adjustment is played sincerely rather than for cheap jokes, and readers who came for the time-travel hook say this is what kept them.
- The world: Knights, goddesses, hearth witchery, magic and even a D&D campaign coexist without collapsing; “rich” is the recurring word.
- The supporting cast: Holly’s mother Magda and the protective Britt get named in reviews as often as the leads, which is unusual and a good sign.
- The premise underneath: Feeding a homeless camp is not set dressing — the book’s real subject is hunger and what one person can do about it, and reviewers respond to that sincerity.
Book Synopsis
Holly Milan used to be on television. She had the Michelin star, the New York restaurant and the boyfriend who came with both, and she left all three to open a pay-what-you-can diner in Fremont, where the money runs the wrong way on purpose. She bakes for the local homeless camp every day and it is never enough, and the gap between how much she cooks and how much hunger there is in the world is the thing she cannot put down.
Eight centuries earlier, Akachi of Asphodel is watching her city burn. She is a knight of the Order of Sophia, sworn to protect a place the Crusaders are in the process of destroying, and when it becomes clear that she cannot, she calls on the Goddess for help. The Goddess answers. Akachi wakes in a city of impossible noise and light, with no order to belong to, no language she recognises and no idea whether she has been saved or discarded.
They meet, and the attraction is immediate and mutual and completely inconvenient for both of them. What neither expects is the second thing they find: a connection that predates the meeting entirely, forged on the day each of them was born, and old enough to suggest that Akachi’s arrival was not an accident of divine mercy. Something wanted her here. Something else would rather she had stayed where she was, and the longer the two women circle the shape of the bond between them, the clearer it becomes that the history they are standing in is not fixed.
My Review
The concept is the reason to read this, and it is genuinely unlike anything else on this site. Sapphic fantasy romance is full of chosen ones and courts; it has almost nothing about a displaced medieval knight learning a modern city while a burnt-out chef feeds a homeless camp. The word reviewers keep reaching for is “weird,” always followed immediately by a qualifier — weird in a good way, weird and delightful. That is an accurate description and it is also a warning: the book does not behave like a romance novel, and the readers who love it love it for that.
The second strength is Holly. Writing a character whose entire idiom is food risks becoming a gimmick by page fifty, and it does not, because the metaphors are doing emotional work rather than decorative work — a woman who can only articulate care as feeding is a specific kind of person, and the book knows it. Readers name her as the funniest thing in the story and then, later in the same reviews, as the reason the ending lands. Akachi is the quieter achievement: a warrior written without swagger, whose competence is gone and whose faith is not.
Where it struggles is structure, and the striking thing is that the complaint comes from the four- and five-star reviews rather than the negative ones. One reader called the plot “all over the place, rambling and sometimes bizarre” and then gave it four stars because the central relationship was sweet enough to forgive it. The same review adds, in parentheses, that the editing remains poor. Another described being unsure what to think for the first half. A third flagged a pacing dip. This is a book with 510 pages and more ideas than architecture, and if a plot that wanders bothers you, it will bother you here.
The romance-specific criticisms are milder and point in two directions at once. A couple of readers found the relationship moved too quickly and wanted more time spent building it; others describe it as a not-so-slow burn where neither woman fights her feelings, which is the same observation with a different sign attached. And more than one reader asked for more explicit content on the grounds that it would anchor the relationship — romance.io’s 3/5 open-door band is accurate, and the sweetness is doing work that heat would do in another book.
One practical note the reviews will not stop making: the cover undersells it badly. “Please ignore the cover on this one” is a direct quote, and it is the single most repeated piece of advice attached to this title.
My honest note: An oddball with a huge heart and visible seams. If you want a tight fantasy romance, look elsewhere; if you want 510 pages of warmth, food and a knight learning to live in Seattle, this is a small treasure.
| Element | In Sweet Paladin |
|---|---|
| Central relationship | Holly Milan & Akachi of Asphodel — a burnt-out celebrity chef and a twelfth-century paladin, destined bond |
| Core tropes | Reverse isekai, time travel, fish out of water, destined bond, hearth witchery, found family, cooking magic |
| Setting | Fremont, Seattle — a pay-what-you-can diner and a homeless camp, with twelfth-century Asphodel behind it |
| Heat level | 3/5 — open door, and several readers wanted more |
| Series | In the Queerness of Time book 1 — the arc resolves; the series has since grown to four books |
| Content notes | Destruction of a city and religious persecution, homelessness and food insecurity, grief and survivor guilt, sexual content, some violence |
How Spicy Is Sweet Paladin?
romance.io bands it at 3 out of 5 and labels it open door, on five ratings, and the reader reports line up with it precisely. Sex happens, it is not skipped over, and it is not what the book is for. The clearest corroboration is the complaint: more than one reviewer specifically asked for more bedroom detail, one of them arguing that it would anchor the relationship, which is not a note readers leave on a spicy book.
The thing worth flagging in advance is not sexual content but subject matter — the novel opens on the destruction of a city by Crusaders and spends much of its length inside food insecurity and homelessness, handled with care but not at arm’s length. No reviewer describes it as dark. For the same band, The Dark Legend sits at 3/5 with the plot doing the heavy lifting, and Elmwood Inclusive Magic Academy matches it in a warmer register.
Who Should Read This Book?
You’ll likely love it if: you want a fantasy romance that is genuinely strange rather than genre-competent, you like reverse-isekai displacement played sincerely, you enjoy food writing and a heroine who thinks in recipes, and 510 pages of warmth is your idea of a good weekend.
You may want to skip it if: you need a disciplined plot, visible editing problems break a book for you, you want explicit heat, or you prefer a romance where the relationship is the only structure holding the story up.
In short: one of the most original premises in indie sapphic fantasy, delivered with more heart than craft — and most readers decide the trade is worth it.
What Readers Are Actually Saying (August 2026)
There is no viral moment behind this one either, and the numbers are modest — 127 Goodreads ratings and 20 written reviews in four years, no trade coverage, no Reddit thread and no audiobook; Libro.fm does not stock it. What is unusual is the intensity: 59% of all Goodreads ratings are five stars, several reviewers report reading 510 pages in a single day, and multiple reviews are written in the voice of someone who did not expect to like it. “A truly wonderful surprise” and “I went in with no expectations” are the two most common openings.
Why readers love it (according to the discourse): Holly first — the hearth witch who speaks about everything in terms of food is named as hilarious, and one reader says she laughed out loud at her. The premise second: reverse isekai is called out by name by readers who know the term and are pleased to find it done in a sapphic romance. Third, the world — “rich” is the recurring word, and the list readers give back is always some version of time travel, knights, magic, witchery, D&D and cooking, delivered as a compliment about range rather than a complaint about clutter. Fourth, and quietly the most repeated: sweetness. The relationship is described as sweet by reviewer after reviewer, and it is what buys the book forgiveness for its structural problems. The minority view worth flagging is from readers who normally dislike time travel and say this one converted them.
What readers argue about and complain about: The plot’s shape, above everything, and the mechanism is that the book keeps adding rather than tightening — one four-star reviewer called it rambling, sometimes bizarre and all over the place, then noted it does mostly resolve, then added in parentheses that the editing remains poor. That parenthesis is the second complaint and it is the craft-level one: line editing is named directly by readers who otherwise loved the book. Third: pacing. Several readers report a soft stretch, usually in the first half, and one says she was unsure what to think until the halfway mark. Fourth, and split down the middle: the romance’s speed. Some wanted more build before the leads settle, while others describe it approvingly as a not-so-slow burn where neither woman wastes time denying herself. Fifth, and near-unanimous: the cover does the book no favours, and readers say so unprompted. The genuine split is between readers who want a well-made novel and readers who want an interesting one.
The series question everyone should ask first: This resolves. Early reviewers complained the sequel was not available yet, and that has been fixed — In the Queerness of Time now runs to four books, including Unbroken Star, Heart of Time and The Polymath’s Apprentice, all in Kindle Unlimited and all rated 4.5 or above on Amazon. Readers report reading them out of order without difficulty. If you are cliffhanger-averse, this is a safe entry point, and the series is now deep enough to binge.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Sweet Paladin a standalone?
Effectively yes. It is book one of In the Queerness of Time and its arc resolves — early reviewers complained only that the sequel had not arrived yet, and the series now runs to four books.
How spicy is Sweet Paladin?
A 3/5. romance.io bands it open door, and more than one reader specifically asked for more bedroom detail, which tells you where the book sits.
What is a reverse isekai, and is that what Sweet Paladin is?
Yes. Instead of sending a modern character into a fantasy world, the book brings a twelfth-century knight into present-day Seattle — readers who know the term use it about this book unprompted.
Is there a Sweet Paladin audiobook?
Not as of August 2026. Libro.fm does not stock it and no audio edition is listed elsewhere, which is common for self-published sapphic fantasy.
Is Sweet Paladin on Kindle Unlimited?
Yes, and so are the three later books in the series — which makes it an easy 510-page book to try without committing to a purchase.
Is Sweet Paladin well edited?
Not entirely, and its own fans say so. Several four- and five-star reviews name the line editing and a rambling plot as real flaws before explaining why they loved the book anyway.
If You Loved Sweet Paladin, Read These Next
A Witch for Solstice shares the cosy hearth-witchery warmth in a much shorter package, The Dark Legend matches the same 3/5 heat band with a far tighter plot if the rambling is what bothered you, and Goddess of the Sea runs the same mortal-meets-the-divine dynamic with more heat. More in paranormal and fantasy lesbian romance and across all our book reviews.
The Bottom Line
Sweet Paladin sets out to be a fantasy romance about hunger — for food, for purpose, for a place to belong — and it delivers three things almost nobody else is delivering: a reverse-isekai premise played straight, a heroine whose entire language is cooking, and a supporting cast readers name by name. What it does not deliver is a disciplined plot, clean line editing or the heat some readers wanted, and its own admirers are the ones saying so. If you can take 510 pages of warm, weird, imperfect fantasy, it is one of the most likeable books in this genre. Check Sweet Paladin on Amazon →
The Eikna Overall Ranking
On the Eikna scale, Sweet Paladin ranks as a big-hearted indie time-travel fantasy romance — original and unusually warm, constrained by loose plotting and visible editing, and best approached for Holly, the food and the displacement rather than for structure or spice.
The Evidence Scorecard
Overall ★★★★☆ 4.1/5
- ✓ 4.39 average across 127 Goodreads ratings
- ✓ 59% of Goodreads ratings are five stars
- ✓ 4.6 on Amazon across 166 ratings
- ✓ Editing named as poor by its own fans
Romance ★★★★☆ 4.1/5
- ✓ “Sweet” is the single most repeated word
- ✓ Neither lead wastes time denying her feelings
- ✓ Destined-bond premise given real backstory
- ✓ Some readers wanted more build before the turn
Characters ★★★★★ 4.5/5
- ✓ Holly speaks about everything in terms of food
- ✓ Akachi written as competence stripped away
- ✓ Magda and Britt named in reviews as often as the leads
- ✓ Villains are the one cast note readers dislike
Writing ★★★★☆ 3.8/5
- ✓ Food metaphors carry emotional weight, not decoration
- ✓ Humour lands — readers report laughing aloud
- ✓ Range across knights, witchery and modern Seattle
- ✓ Line editing criticised directly and repeatedly
Emotional Impact ★★★★☆ 4.2/5
- ✓ Feeding a homeless camp is the book’s real subject
- ✓ Akachi’s failure to save her Order given weight
- ✓ Readers describe finishing it in one sitting
- ✓ A soft first half delays the payoff
Heat Level ★★★☆☆ 3/5
- ✓ romance.io bands it 3/5 open door
- ✓ Sex is on the page and not skipped
- ✓ Readers asked for more bedroom detail
- ✓ romance.io entry rests on five ratings
Ending ★★★★☆ 4.1/5
- ✓ The arc resolves; no cliffhanger reported
- ✓ Series has since grown to four books
- ✓ Later books rated 4.5+ on Amazon
- ✓ One reader found the plot resolving late
Re-read Value ★★★★☆ 4.2/5
- ✓ Multiple readers report a single-day binge
- ✓ Dense world rewards a second pass
- ✓ Three sequels available in Kindle Unlimited
- ✓ No audiobook exists for a second format
Affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
One Last Stop is the kind of romance that people press into your hands and swear will fix your week — and for the most part it earns that devotion. Casey McQuiston takes a deceptively simple meet-cute — a girl you keep seeing on the subway — and bends it into something stranger and more tender: Jane isn’t just elusive, she’s displaced in time, riding the Q line since the 1970s. It’s a premise that could collapse into gimmick, but McQuiston plays it for real emotional stakes about loneliness, memory and the fear of losing people.